The recent study by Mihata et al., [10] "" (. 2019;101:1921-1930), was the first case series published examining long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) for irreparable rotator cuff tears. This article is a critical review of how the aforementioned study fits into a growing literature surrounding the use of SCR for irreparable rotator cuff tears and how these results may impact clinical and operative decision-making for this patient population. The series compares clinical and radiographic data taken pre-operatively with data taken at 1 year and 5 years post-operatively in a group of 30 patients who underwent SCR utilizing tensor fascia lata autograft. While the results of the study suggest that a healed SCR graft utilizing this specific technique successfully restored shoulder function and prevented progression of rotator cuff arthropathy, it is important to appreciate the limitations of this small, retrospective case series. Nonetheless, the study represents an important addition to the expanding literature surrounding this significant topic. In this report, we shed light on the current state of this novel operative technique and the ongoing controversies revolving around graft material and thickness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749914PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-020-09796-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rotator cuff
12
superior capsule
8
capsule reconstruction
8
case series
8
clinical radiographic
8
scr irreparable
8
irreparable rotator
8
cuff tears
8
literature surrounding
8
reconstruction glimpse
4

Similar Publications

Background: Recurrent shoulder dislocations often lead to multiple encounters for reduction and eventual surgical stabilization, both of which involve exposure to opioids and potentially increase the risk of chronic opioid exposure. The purpose of our study was to characterize shoulder instability and compare pre- and post-reduction opioid usage in singular dislocators (SD) and recurrent dislocators (RD).

Methods: This retrospective study was performed at a single academic institution using a prospective database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: There has been an increase in both primary anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) over the last decade, with rates peaking for patients aged 75 years and older. Despite aTSA being the mainstay of treatment for patients with glenohumeral arthritis in the absence of rotator cuff insufficiency, there has been an upward trend of rTSA utilization in the elderly due to concerns about rotator cuff integrity, regardless of deformity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes including pain, function, range of motion, satisfaction, and complications in patients 80 years or older following primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis without full thickness rotator cuff tears.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Thank you for your deep interest in our article entitled "The incidence of Popeye Deformity after Soft Tissue Biceps Tenodesis is Comparable to Biceps Anchor Tenodesis and Lower than Biceps Tenotomy During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair". We'll do our best to answer your questions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The incidence of Popeye Deformity after Soft Tissue Biceps Tenodesis is Comparable to Biceps Anchor Tenodesis and Lower than Biceps Tenotomy During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair- letter to editor.

Arthroscopy

January 2025

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Defense Medical Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, #325, Section 2, Chenggung Road, Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keelung Branch of Tri-Service General Hospital, Taiwan. Electronic address:

We have carefully reviewed the article entitled "The incidence of Popeye Deformity after Soft Tissue Biceps Tenodesis is Comparable to Biceps Anchor Tenodesis and Lower than Biceps Tenotomy During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair" by Hyun Gon Kim et al. and found it very interesting. While we appreciate the authors' efforts, we have some questions about certain aspects of the study methodology that we hope they can address.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!