Purpose: Previous literature has documented that college professors view hypothetical students who stutter more negatively than their fluent peers. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether individuals who stutter report they experience more negative perceptions in the college classroom, and the impact of those perceptions on their comfort approaching professors.
Methods: Two hundred forty-six adults who do and do not stutter, matched for age, participated in this study. Participants were presented with 16 positive and negative personality traits and asked to rate how strongly they believed their professor viewed them along each trait. All participants were asked whether they felt comfortable approaching their professors to discuss their performance. Adults who stutter were asked additional questions to investigate their college experience more comprehensively.
Results: Adults who stutter reported they experienced significantly more negative perceptions from their professors than adults who do not stutter, and were significantly less likely to feel comfortable approaching their professors. These reported negative perceptions, specifically being perceived as less self-assured, predicted comfort approaching professors to receive performance feedback for adults who stutter. Finally, amongst adults who stutter, perception of how they were evaluated compared to their peers was significantly related to comfort approaching professors.
Conclusions: Results support that the negative perceptions towards hypothetical students who stutter reported in previous literature are experienced by individuals who stutter, and that these perceptions drive comfort approaching professors for performative feedback. Results suggest professors may increase students' comfort by clearly outlining equality in evaluation procedures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105826 | DOI Listing |
Disabil Rehabil
January 2025
Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, University of London, London, UK.
Purpose: To determine what evidence there is for the effectiveness/efficacy of interventions to improve outcomes in adults with Functional Communication Disorders (FCDs).
Materials And Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched two platforms. The review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines.
Int J Med Inform
January 2025
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Sciences Research Center , Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Artificial Intelligence, Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address:
Background: Speech disorders can significantly impact communication, social interaction, and overall quality of life, affecting individuals of all ages. Telespeech therapy has emerged as an innovative solution, leveraging technology to provide accessible and effective speech interventions remotely. This approach offers flexibility and convenience, addressing barriers such as geographical limitations and scheduling conflicts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Speech Lang Hear Res
January 2025
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, United Kingdom.
Purpose: Talking in unison with a partner, otherwise known as choral speech, reliably induces fluency in people who stutter (PWS). This effect may arise because choral speech addresses a hypothesized motor timing deficit by giving PWS an external rhythm to align with and scaffold their utterances onto. This study tested this theory by comparing the choral speech rhythm of people who do and do not stutter to assess whether both groups change their rhythm in similar ways when talking chorally.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
January 2025
Department of Audiology, Ankara Medipol University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address:
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate musical pitch and timbre perception in children who stutter and compare the results with typically developing children.
Methods: A total of 50 participants were included in the study, consisting of 25 children with stuttering (mean age = 10.06 years; range 6-17 years) and 25 typically developing children (mean age = 10.
Folia Phoniatr Logop
January 2025
Introduction: The study aims to investigate the relationship between pragmatic language skills of children who stutter (CWS) and the frequency of stuttering, with a focus on the development of these skills through peer interaction in the school years. It is well-known that CWS may face social disadvantages at school due to their limited peer interaction, which may pose a risk to the development of their pragmatic language skills.
Method: The study involved 64 CWS aged between 60 and 106 months.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!