[Comparing group educational intervention to individual and self-learning in COPD].

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered a public health issue which affects 10.2% of Spanish population between 40 and 80 years of age. Many patients do not perform well the inhalation technique. Error rates vary between 50-80% depending on the device under study. These values haven been proven to decrease with educational interventions.

Objective: To ascertain whether a group educational intervention is superior to an individual intervention or to a conventional approach in these patients as regards quality of life measured by means of the total score of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT),of adherence to treatment, exacerbations and hospitalizations.

Material And Methods: A multicenter, multidisciplinary cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial with three branches (conventional intervention, individual intervention and group intervention) in a cohort of COPD-patients. Sociodemographic data and risk factors were collected and several questionnaires were completed (CAT, BODEx, Barthel, Lawton y Brody). A descriptive analysis of qualitative and quantitative variables and a multiple linear regression were conducted.

Outcomes: 149 patients of average age 69.08 (SD 1.26). Significant differences were observed in CAT in the different intervention groups according to the level of severity on BODEx. The rate of patients performing well the inhalation technique was significantly lower at the beginning of the study and the number of exacerbations was lower after the intervention. Last year's exacerbations were linearly related to post-intervention suffering.

Conclusions: Better results are obtained using the traditional and individual interventions. There is a decrease in number of exacerbations, hospitalizations, CAT score and post-intervention inhalation technique.