Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare workers (HCWs) are at the forefront of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. To overcome the lack of human resources during this crisis, some ICUs had to mobilise staff from a reinforcement pool, with no or outdated ICU experience. This study aimed to investigate and to compare the psychological impact of the pandemic on regular ICU staff members and reinforcement workers.

Material And Methods: Self-assessment questionnaires were completed by HCWs who worked from March 1 to April 30, 2020, in our 16-bed neurological ICU at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris, France, which was converted to a COVID ICU. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5, McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised, and 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale were used to assess anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, quality of life, and resilience, respectively.

Results: Sixty-nine ICU HCWs completed the survey (37 from the team of regular staff members, i.e., from the public health service, and 32 from a reinforcement pool, either from non-ICU public health service or from private healthcare interim employment agencies). Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms was high, at 19%, 9%, and 16%, respectively, with limited impairment in quality of life or resilience scores. Depression symptoms were observed more in regular staff members than in welcomed reinforcement workers, at 16% and 0%, respectively.

Conclusions: These results revealed that during the pandemic, HCWs from the team of regular staff members were at greater risk of developing psychological disorder compared with reinforcement workers, with higher levels of depressive symptoms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691186PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2020.11.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

staff members
20
reinforcement workers
12
anxiety depression
12
post-traumatic stress
12
stress disorder
12
quality life
12
regular staff
12
coronavirus disease
8
disease 2019
8
psychological impact
8

Similar Publications

Reaccreditation and Pathways Recognition Experiences of Small Local and Tribal Health Departments.

J Public Health Manag Pract

November 2024

Author Affiliations: Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri (Allen and Crenshaw); Department of Health Policy and Organization, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (Fifolt); School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (Erwin); Research and Evaluation, Public Health Accreditation Board, Alexandria, Virginia (Lang, Belflower Thomas, and Kuehnert); and Lipstein Distinguished Professor of Public Health, Prevention Research Center, Brown School, and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center and Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri (Brownson).

Context: This paper describes experiences and views of leadership teams from 4 small local health departments (LHDs) seeking Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) reaccreditation or Pathways Recognition using PHAB Standards & Measures Version 2022. The Pathways program launched in 2022 provides additional supports for improvement of public health practice.

Objective: Given the need to accelerate accreditation among small health departments, the purpose of this study is to share small health departments' strategies for overcoming accreditation challenges and actionable advice for use by other health departments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Public Health Accreditation Board Accreditation and Pathways Recognition Among Small Health Departments: Motivation, Communication, and Celebration.

J Public Health Manag Pract

November 2024

Author Affiliations: Department of Health Policy and Organization, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (Drs Fifolt and Erwin); Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri (Dr Peg and Mr Crenshaw); Research and Evaluation, Public Health Accreditation Board, Alexandria, Virginia (Mx Lang and Ms Belflower Thomas); Lipstein Distinguished Professor of Public Health, Prevention Research Center, Brown School; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center and Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri (Dr Brownson).

This paper explores how small local health departments (LHDs) motivated staff members, communicated progress toward Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation or Pathways Recognition, and celebrated interim and final accreditation accomplishments. Qualitative key informant interviews were conducted with 22 employees and affiliates of 4 LHDs with jurisdiction populations <50 000. LHDs motivated staff through ownership, creative strategies to monitor and record progress, and meaningful no- or low-cost incentives.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Implementation of a data-driven quality improvement program in primary care for patients with coronary heart disease: a mixed methods evaluation of acceptability, satisfaction, barriers and enablers.

Aust J Prim Health

January 2025

School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; and The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Barangaroo, NSW, Australia.

Background The study aimed to understand the acceptability, satisfaction, uptake, utility and feasibility of a quality improvement (QI) intervention to improve care for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients in Australian primary care practices and identify barriers and enablers, including the impact of COVID-19. Methods Within the QUality improvement for Effectiveness of care for people Living with heart disease (QUEL) study, 26 Australian primary care practices, supported by five Primary Health Networks (PHN) participated in a 1-year QI intervention (November 2019 - November 2020). Data were collected from practices and PHNs staff via surveys and semi-structured interviews.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cervical cancer disparities persist among minoritized women due to infrequent screening and poor follow-up. Structural and psychosocial barriers to following up with colposcopy are problematic for minoritized women. Evidence-based interventions using patient navigation and tailored telephone counseling, including the Tailored Communication for Cervical Cancer Risk (TC3), have modestly improved colposcopy attendance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Low Bone Mineral Density and Associated Factors Among People Living With HIV in Kerman, Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study in 2021-2022.

J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care

January 2025

Hamidreza Rashidi, MD, is a Researcher, HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Chronic diseases such as osteoporosis and low bone mineral density (BMD) are significant public health concerns for people living with HIV (PLWH), especially with the increased life expectancy because of antiretroviral therapy (ART). This study evaluated the prevalence and associated factors of low BMD among 94 PLWH in Kerman, Iran, from September 2021 to February 2022. Using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, BMD was measured, with low BMD defined by specific T-scores and Z-scores.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!