Background And Aims: There are no established premedication schemes for less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in neonatal RDS. The aim was to describe "real-world" practices and to assess the safety of premedication and its impact on the technical ease of the LISA procedure.
Methods: Data from the prospective LISA cohort study conducted in 31 tertiary neonatal units were evaluated for premedication practices. Infants who received analgesics and/or sedatives before LISA and those receiving non-pharmacological sedation with sublingual 30% glucose were compared versus nonpremedicated neonates, acting as a reference. Safety of premedication was assessed with the rate of adverse events during LISA, changes in oxygenation status, the need for rescue intubation, and mechanical ventilation in the first 24 h of life. Ease of conducting LISA was an efficacy endpoint.
Results: Of 500 enrolled newborns, 102 (20.4%) received premedication for LISA; 88 infants were given analgesics/sedatives and 14 sublingual glucose. Pharmacological sedation was most often performed with ketamine (51/88; 57.9%), midazolam (16/88; 18.2%) and propofol (8/88; 1.6%). Compared to non-premedication, the use of analgesics/sedatives was associated with a significant increase in the rate of apnea (9.1 vs 2.6%; = 0.009) and a significantly higher decrease in SpO/FiO (-55 ± 62 vs -32 ± 50; < 0.001). However, the rates of rescue intubation and the need for early mechanical ventilation were not significantly different. Sedation with glucose did not affect the frequency of adverse events. LISA procedures had a similar level of ease regardless of the premedication used and were rated as or in 69% of non-premedicated infants, 65.9% of the analgesics/sedatives group and 78.5% of the glucose group (p = ns).
Conclusion: Analgesics/sedatives prior to LISA increased the rate of apnea and decreased blood oxygenation but did not lead to tracheal intubation and early mechanical ventilation. Trials addressing the impact on LISA-related stress are necessary to determine the ultimate usefulness of premedication.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1863365 | DOI Listing |
Syst Rev
January 2025
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Science, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Background: Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) involves using antibiotics after surgery to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs). However, studies have shown that PAP offers no additional benefits compared to discontinuation after surgical incision closure, prompting its de-implementation to prevent unnecessary antibiotic use that may contribute to antibiotic resistance. We conducted this review to synthesize evidence for guiding the design and implementation of effective strategies for discontinuing PAP practice and optimizing antibiotic use in surgical settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Oral Investig
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2227 - Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil.
Objectives: This study evaluates the selective outcome reporting (SOR) in clinical trials on antibiotic use in third molar surgeries. It explores how SOR may bias results and affect systematic reviews, potentially leading to misinterpretations of intervention efficacy.
Materials And Methods: A search was conducted on "ClinicalTrials.
Tuberk Toraks
December 2024
Clinic of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Türkiye.
Introduction: Sedation is often required during flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) to ensure patient comfort and the success of the procedure. The choice of sedative agents may differ between anesthesiologists and pulmonologists. This pilot study aimed to investigate the current pre-procedure preparation, monitoring, premedication and sedation practices for FFB in Türkiye, focusing on the preferences and practices of pulmonologists.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatr Qual Saf
December 2024
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Hackensack-Meridian Health, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, N.J.
Introduction: Endotracheal intubation is frequent in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) but may result in neonatal distress and instability. Premedication reduces adverse effects, such as hypoxia, bradycardia, and pain. The Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time-Bound aim for this project was to increase premedication use for nonemergent neonatal intubation in a specific NICU from 22% to 80% from March 2021 to May 2023.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAsian Pac J Cancer Prev
December 2024
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Buddhasothorn Hospital, Chachoengsao, Thailand.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of premedication protocols in preventing immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to taxane chemotherapy by comparing protocols that omit H2 antagonists with those that include famotidine.
Methods: This was an open-label, single-center, randomized clinical trial. Randomization was 1:1 to two groups.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!