Purpose: In multileaf collimator (MLC) tracking, the MLC positions from the original treatment plan are continuously modified to account for intrafraction tumor motion. As the treatment is adapted in real time, there is additional risk of delivery errors which cannot be detected using traditional pretreatment dose verification. The purpose of this work is to develop a system for real-time geometric verification of MLC tracking treatments using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID).
Methods: MLC tracking was utilized during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). During these deliveries, treatment beam images were taken at 9.57 frames per second using an EPID and frame grabber computer. MLC positions were extracted from each image frame and used to assess delivery accuracy using three geometric measures: the location, size, and shape of the radiation field. The EPID-measured field location was compared to the tumor motion measured by implanted electromagnetic markers. The size and shape of the beam were compared to the size and shape from the original treatment plan, respectively. This technique was validated by simulating errors in phantom test deliveries and by comparison between EPID measurements and treatment log files. The method was applied offline to images acquired during the LIGHT Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) clinical trial, where MLC tracking was performed for 17 lung cancer patients. The EPID-based verification results were subsequently compared to post-treatment dose reconstruction.
Results: Simulated field location errors were detected during phantom validation tests with an uncertainty of 0.28 mm (parallel to MLC motion) and 0.38 mm (perpendicular), expressed as a root-mean-square error (RMS ). For simulated field size errors, the RMS was 0.47 cm and field shape changes were detected for random errors with standard deviation ≥ 2.5 mm. For clinical lung SABR deliveries, field location errors of 1.6 mm (parallel MLC motion) and 4.9 mm (perpendicular) were measured (expressed as a full-width-half-maximum). The mean and standard deviation of the errors in field size and shape were 0.0 ± 0.3 cm and 0.3 ± 0.1 (expressed as a translation-invariant normalized RMS). No correlation was observed between geometric errors during each treatment fraction and dosimetric errors in the reconstructed dose to the target volume for this cohort of patients.
Conclusion: A system for real-time delivery verification has been developed for MLC tracking using time-resolved EPID imaging. The technique has been tested offline in phantom-based deliveries and clinical patient deliveries and was used to independently verify the geometric accuracy of the MLC during MLC tracking radiotherapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14675 | DOI Listing |
Commun Biol
December 2024
Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
This study focuses on refining growth-rate-based drug response metrics for patient-derived tumor organoid screening using brightfield live-cell imaging. Traditional metrics like Normalized Growth Rate Inhibition (GR) and Normalized Drug Response (NDR) have been used to assess organoid responses to anticancer treatments but face limitations in accurately quantifying cytostatic and cytotoxic effects across varying growth rates. Here, we introduce the Normalized Organoid Growth Rate (NOGR) metric, specifically developed for brightfield imaging-based assays.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStem Cell Res Ther
October 2024
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-Ro, Bundang-Gu, 463-707, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol
August 2024
Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Toronto, Toronto M5G 1V7, Canada.
Background: Canada has one of the highest incidences of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide. CRC screening improves CRC outcomes and is cost-effective. This study compares Canadian CRC screening programs using essential elements of an organized screening program outlined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Appl Clin Med Phys
August 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Purpose: This study presents a novel and comprehensive framework for evaluating magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) workflow by integrating the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) approach with Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC). We assess the workflow for safety, quality, and economic implications, providing a holistic understanding of the MRgRT implementation. The aim is to offer valuable insights to healthcare practitioners and administrators, facilitating informed decision-making regarding the 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Phys
April 2024
Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Background: Several (online) adaptive radiotherapy procedures are available to maximize healthy tissue sparing in the presence of inter/intrafractional motion during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on an MR-linac. The increased treatment complexity and the motion-delivery interplay during these treatments require MR-compatible motion phantoms with time-resolved dosimeters to validate end-to-end workflows. This is not possible with currently available phantoms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!