Effect of RSA glenoid baseplate central fixation on micromotion and bone stress.

JSES Int

Faculté de Médecine de Tours, CHRU Trousseau Service d'Orthopédie Traumatologie, Université de Tours, Tours, France.

Published: December 2020

Background: In reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSA), osseous in-growth is promoted if glenoid micromotion does not exceed 150 μm. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the configuration of central fixation for RSA glenoid baseplates reduces implant micromotion or changes scapula bone stresses.

Methods: Using finite element analysis, glenoid baseplate fixation was tested in a cohort of 3 male and 2 female patients who were to undergo RSA. Computer models were created for 3 different RSA glenoid baseplate and 84 glenosphere designs, a central threaded peg (1 variant, D-TP), a central unthreaded peg (2 variants, I- 85 P(15) and I-P(25)), and a central peg with a screw (2 variants, A-PS and I-PS). A compressive and shear force of 756 N was distributed across the glenosphere with the scapula anchored.

Results: Displacement was within 20-130 μm at the glenosphere baseplate-bone interface for all baseplates. The glenospheres with unthreaded pegs had intermediate displacement values (I-P(15): median, 89 μm; range, 32-112 μm; and I-P(25): median, 93 μm; range, 31-109 μm). The von Mises stresses were 1.8-7.0 MPa within cortical bone and 0.6-1.6 MPa within trabecular bone. Cortical bone stresses were similar with unthreaded pegs (I-P(15): median, 4.2 MPa; range, 1.8-6.0 MPa; and I-P(25): median, 4.2 MPa; range, 1.8-6.1 MPa), whereas mean trabecular stresses were similar for all configurations.

Conclusions: All configurations yielded adequate stability, with micromotions being below 150 μm. The unthreaded pegged designs provided a valid alternative to the stable threaded pegged convex baseplates in terms of micromotions and bone stresses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7738598PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rsa glenoid
12
glenoid baseplate
12
central fixation
8
150 μm
8
unthreaded pegs
8
i-p15 median
8
median μm
8
μm range
8
i-p25 median
8
cortical bone
8

Similar Publications

Objective: This study evaluated the effects of bony increased offset (BIO) and metallic augments (MAs) on primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) baseplate stability in cadaveric specimens with variable bone densities.

Methods: Thirty cadaveric specimens were analyzed in an imaging and biomechanical investigation. Computed tomography (CT) scans allowed for preoperative RSA planning and bone density analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Lateralisation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty - A narrative review.

J Clin Orthop Trauma

March 2025

Department of Orthopaedics, Woodend Hospital, Aberdeen, AB15 6XS, UK.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has witnessed a significant advancement with the introduction of lateralisation techniques, aiming to enhance shoulder function and implant durability. Traditional medialised designs, following Grammont's principles, have encountered challenges such as scapular notching, reduced rotational strength, and instability. In contrast, lateralisation methods, which reposition the joint center of rotation laterally on the glenoid, humerus, or both, seek to improve deltoid leverage, optimize the rotator cuff muscles' length-tension relationship, and enhance joint stability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is increasingly used in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with reliable clinical improvement. Lateralized RSA implants have conferred superior outcomes compared with the original Grammont design in patients with nontraumatic indications. However, in the setting of a PHF, lateralized components can place increased tension across the tuberosity fracture site and potentially compromise tuberosity healing and outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Outcomes of Augmented versus Standard Baseplates in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg

January 2025

Palm Beach Shoulder Service HCA Florida Atlantis Orthopedics, Palm Beach, FL, USA; JFK/University of Miami Department of Orthopedics, Lake Worth, FL, USA. Electronic address:

Background: Glenoid bone loss presents a complex challenge in the management of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) undergoing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA). Eccentric reaming and bone grafting have been utilized to address this issue but are associated with their own set of challenges. This study explores the effectiveness of augmented glenoid baseplate RSA in addressing glenoid bone loss.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

CT imaging findings in symptomatic patients with and without revision surgery after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Skeletal Radiol

January 2025

Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.

Objectives: To evaluate CT imaging findings in symptomatic patients with and without revision surgery (RS) after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).

Materials And Methods: In this retrospective study, two radiologists assessed CT imaging findings in symptomatic patients with RSA over 5 years, including material fracture and loosening of the peg, baseplate, screws, and humeral stem, screw positioning, prosthesis dislocation, glenoid notching, fractures, and deltoid muscle quality. The primary outcome parameter was RS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!