Background: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of telomerase activity (TA) for bladder cancer (BC) by meta-analysis.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to June 1, 2019. We used Stata 15 and Review Manager 5.3 for calculations and statistical analysis.

Results: To evaluate the diagnostic value of TA for BC, we performed a meta-analysis on 22 studies, with a total of 2,867 individuals, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR, NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The pooled parameters were calculated from all studies, and we found a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.84), a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), a PLR of 8.91 (95% CI: 5.91-13.43), an NLR of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.15-0.37), a DOR of 37.90 (95% CI: 23.32-61.59), and an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94). We also conducted a subgroup analysis based on the different stages and grades of BC. Results from the subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in TA in either high and low stages of BC, but that low-grade tumors had a lower TA than high-grade tumours.

Conclusions: TA can be used as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer with its high specificity. Rigorous and high-quality prospective studies are required to verify our conclusion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7744937PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.570127DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bladder cancer
12
diagnostic telomerase
8
telomerase activity
8
evaluate diagnostic
8
subgroup analysis
8
95%
7
diagnostic
5
activity patients
4
patients bladder
4
cancer meta-analysis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!