AI Article Synopsis

  • Access to communication for individuals with late-stage ALS is crucial, especially when they have limited movement and visual impairments that hinder traditional eye tracking and BCI systems.
  • This study examined the effectiveness of modified eye tracking and SSVEP BCI using a Shuffle Speller typing interface with two participants who faced these challenges.
  • Results showed improved typing performance with the Shuffle Speller interface, achieving up to 89% accuracy with BCI for one participant, highlighting the potential of these technologies while also indicating the need for further development to enhance consistency and accuracy in communication.

Article Abstract

Access to communication is critical for individuals with late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and minimal volitional movement, but they sometimes present with concomitant visual or ocular motility impairments that affect their performance with eye tracking or visual brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. In this study, we explored the use of modified eye tracking and steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) BCI, in combination with the Shuffle Speller typing interface, for this population. Two participants with late-stage ALS, visual impairments, and minimal volitional movement completed a single-case experimental research design comparing copy-spelling performance with three different typing systems: (1) commercially available eye tracking communication software, (2) Shuffle Speller with modified eye tracking, and (3) Shuffle Speller with SSVEP BCI. Participant 1 was unable to type any correct characters with the commercial system, but achieved accuracies of up to 50% with Shuffle Speller eye tracking and 89% with Shuffle Speller BCI. Participant 2 also had higher maximum accuracies with Shuffle Speller, typing with up to 63% accuracy with eye tracking and 100% accuracy with BCI. However, participants' typing accuracy for both Shuffle Speller conditions was highly variable, particularly in the BCI condition. Both the Shuffle Speller interface and SSVEP BCI input show promise for improving typing performance for people with late-stage ALS. Further development of innovative BCI systems for this population is needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715037PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.595890DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

shuffle speller
32
eye tracking
28
ssvep bci
16
late-stage als
12
individuals late-stage
8
als visual
8
visual impairments
8
minimal volitional
8
volitional movement
8
bci
8

Similar Publications

SSVEP BCI and Eye Tracking Use by Individuals With Late-Stage ALS and Visual Impairments.

Front Hum Neurosci

November 2020

Consortium for Accessible Multimodal Brain-Body Interfaces (CAMBI), Portland, OR, United States.

Article Synopsis
  • Access to communication for individuals with late-stage ALS is crucial, especially when they have limited movement and visual impairments that hinder traditional eye tracking and BCI systems.
  • This study examined the effectiveness of modified eye tracking and SSVEP BCI using a Shuffle Speller typing interface with two participants who faced these challenges.
  • Results showed improved typing performance with the Shuffle Speller interface, achieving up to 89% accuracy with BCI for one participant, highlighting the potential of these technologies while also indicating the need for further development to enhance consistency and accuracy in communication.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Individuals with severe speech and physical impairments may have concomitant visual acuity impairments (VAI) or ocular motility impairments (OMI) impacting visual BCI use. We report on the use of the Shuffle Speller typing interface for an SSVEP BCI copy-spelling task under three conditions: simulated VAI, simulated OMI, and unimpaired vision. To mitigate the effect of visual impairments, we introduce a method that adaptively selects a user-specific trial length to maximize expected information transfer rate (ITR); expected ITR is shown to closely approximate the rate of correct letter selections.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) seek to infer some task symbol, a task relevant instruction, from brain symbols, classifiable physiological states. For example, in a motor imagery robot control task a user would indicate their choice from a dictionary of task symbols (rotate arm left, grasp, etc.) by selecting from a smaller dictionary of brain symbols (imagined left or right hand movements).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!