A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 144

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3106
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Individualized Responses to Ipsilesional High-Frequency and Contralesional Low-Frequency rTMS in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study to Support the Individualization of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation. | LitMetric

: In this pilot study, we examined the effects of ipsilesional high-frequency rTMS (iHF-rTMS) and contralesional low-frequency rTMS (cLF-rTMS) applied a double-cone coil on neurophysiological and gait variables in patients with chronic stroke. : To determine the group and individual level effects of two types of stimulation to better individualize neuromodulation for rehabilitation. : Using a randomized, within-subject, double-blind, sham-controlled trial with 14 chronic stroke participants iHF-rTMS and cLF-rTMS were applied a double-cone coil to the tibialis anterior cortical representation. Neurophysiological and gait variables were compared pre-post rTMS. : A small effect of cLF-rTMS indicated increased MEP amplitudes (Cohen's D; cLF-rTMS, = -0.30). Group-level analysis RMANOVA showed no significant group effects of stimulation ( > 0.099). However, secondary analyses of individual data showed a high degree of response variability to rTMS. Individual percent changes in resting motor threshold and normalized MEP latency correlated with changes in gait propulsive forces and walking speed (iHF-rTMS, nLAT:Pp, = 0.632 = 0.015; cLF-rTMS, rMT:SSWS, = -0.557, = 0.039; rMT:Pp, = 0.718, = 0.004). : Changes in propulsive forces and walking speed were seen in some individuals that showed neurophysiological changes in response to rTMS. The neurological consequences of stroke are heterogeneous making a "one type fits all" approach to neuromodulation for rehabilitation unlikely. This pilot study suggests that an individual's unique response to rTMS should be considered before the application/selection of neuromodulatory therapies. Before neuromodulatory therapies can be incorporated into standard clinical practice, additional work is needed to identify biomarkers of response and how best to prescribe neuromodulation for rehabilitation for post-stroke gait.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717949PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.578127DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neuromodulation rehabilitation
16
chronic stroke
12
pilot study
12
ipsilesional high-frequency
8
contralesional low-frequency
8
low-frequency rtms
8
rehabilitation pilot
8
clf-rtms applied
8
applied double-cone
8
double-cone coil
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!