LCA of a Membrane Bioreactor Compared to Activated Sludge System for Municipal Wastewater Treatment.

Membranes (Basel)

Laboratory of Chemical Engineering and Engineering Sustainability, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, Environmental Conservation and Management, Open University of Cyprus, Latsia P.O. Box 12794, 2252 Nicosia, Cyprus.

Published: December 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems offer advantages over conventional activated sludge (CAS) units for municipal wastewater treatment, particularly in achieving high-quality effluent.
  • This study evaluates the life cycle environmental impact of MBR versus CAS units, focusing on various factors like global warming potential and eutrophication through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology.
  • Results indicated that MBR processes consistently show better environmental performance than CAS processes across all examined impact categories.

Article Abstract

Membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems are connected to several advantages compared to the conventional activated sludge (CAS) units. This work aims to the examination of the life cycle environmental impact of an MBR against a CAS unit when treating municipal wastewater with similar influent loading (BOD = 400 mg/L) and giving similar high-quality effluent (BOD < 5 mg/L). The MBR unit contained a denitrification, an aeration and a membrane tank, whereas the CAS unit included an equalization, a denitrification, a nitrification, a sedimentation, a mixing, a flocculation tank and a drum filter. Several impact categories factors were calculated by implementing the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology, including acidification potential, eutrophication potential, global warming potential (GWP), ozone depletion potential and photochemical ozone creation potential of the plants throughout their life cycle. Real data from two wastewater treatment plants were used. The research focused on two parameters which constitute the main differences between the two treatment plants: The excess sludge removal life cycle contribution-where GWP = 0.50 kg CO-eq*FU and GWP = 2.67 kg CO-eq*FU without sludge removal-and the wastewater treatment plant life cycle contribution-where GWP = 0.002 kg CO-eq*FU and GWP = 0.14 kg CO-eq*FU without land area contribution. Finally, in all the examined cases the environmental superiority of the MBR process was found.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765054PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10120421DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

life cycle
20
wastewater treatment
12
membrane bioreactor
8
activated sludge
8
municipal wastewater
8
cas unit
8
treatment plants
8
cycle contribution-where
8
contribution-where gwp
8
co-eq*fu gwp
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!