Low-Dose CT in Pelvic Imaging: Comparing Dose and Image Quality in Relation to Clinical Value in a Phantom Study.

The aim of this phantom study was to determine whether low-dose CT of the pelvis can be performed using a dose similar to that used in a standard radio-graphic examination and to ascertain whether CT, with its better delineation of complex structures, has greater clinical value than radiography and therefore will result in improved patient care. Special consideration was given to CT performed using the tin filtration technique. For dose comparison, an anthropomorphic phantom with 20 thermoluminescent dosimeters, two different CT scanners, and three conventional radiography devices were used. Seven CT protocols (including tin filtration) and four different radiographic examinations were performed. Dose calculations, objective and subjective evaluations of image quality, and figure-of-merit calculations were compared among the techniques. Furthermore, the images obtained were evaluated in a clinical context. Intraclass correlation was determined for the subjective results. The dose values of the tested low-dose CT protocols, in particular those using the tin filtration technique, corresponded to or were only slightly higher than the dose values of conventional pelvic radiographic images obtained in three views. Low-dose CT examinations were rated sufficient for consolidation control and had an informative value that was significantly higher than that of conventional radiography. Tin filtering showed the best results for low-dose CT in terms of combining dose and clinically relevant image quality. In this phantom study, low-dose CT was superior to radiography for visualizing and evaluating the dorsal pelvic ring, with only marginally higher radiation exposure occurring when the latest-generation CT systems were used. Tin filtration can improve image quality, create further dose reductions, or provide both benefits.