AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared recovery outcomes of living kidney donors using two anesthesia methods: total intravenous propofol vs. inhalational desflurane during surgery.
  • A total of 80 participants, aged around 46, were randomly assigned to each anesthesia group, and their postoperative recovery was assessed using the QoR-40K questionnaire and other metrics.
  • Results showed that the propofol group had better recovery scores, higher ambulation success rates, fewer nausea/vomiting incidents, and shorter hospital stays compared to the desflurane group.

Article Abstract

Objectives: We compared early recovery outcomes between living kidney donors who received total intravenous (IV) propofol versus inhalational desflurane during hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Design: A single-centre, prospective randomised controlled trial.

Setting: University hospital.

Participants: Study participants were enrolled between October 2019 and February 2020. A total of 80 living donors were randomly assigned to an intravenous propofol group (n=40) or a desflurane group (n=40).

Intervention: Propofol group received intravenous propofol and desflurane group received desflurane, as a maintenance anaesthetic.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: The quality of postoperative functional recovery was primarily assessed using the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40K) questionnaire on postoperative day 1. Secondarily, ambulation, pain score, rescue analgesics, complications and total hospital stay were assessed postoperatively.

Results: Our study population included 35 males and 45 females. The mean age was 46±13 years. The global QoR-40K score (161 (154-173) vs 152 (136-161) points, respectively, p=0.001) and all five subdimension scores (physical comfort, 49 (45-53) vs 45 (42-48) points, respectively, p=0.003; emotional state, 39 (37-41) vs 37 (33-41) points, respectively, p=0.005; psychological support, 30 (26-34) vs 28 (26-32) points, respectively, p=0.04; physical independence, 16 (11-18) vs 12 (8-14) points, respectively, p=0.004; and pain, 31 (28-33) vs 29 (25-31) points, respectively, p=0.021) were significantly higher in the intravenous propofol group than the desflurane group. The early ambulation success rate and numbers of early and total steps were higher, but the incidence of nausea/vomiting was lower, in the intravenous propofol group than the desflurane group. The total hospital stay after surgery was shorter in the intravenous propofol group than the desflurane group.

Conclusions: Intravenous propofol may enhance the quality of postoperative recovery in comparison to desflurane in living kidney donors.

Trial Registration Number: KCT0004365.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745310PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039881DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intravenous propofol
32
propofol group
20
desflurane group
16
group desflurane
12
propofol
9
desflurane
9
group
9
intravenous
8
inhalational desflurane
8
early recovery
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!