Psychological ownership: implicit and explicit.

Curr Opin Psychol

Questrom School of Business, Boston University, 595 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215, United States. Electronic address:

Published: June 2021

Object ownership changes how people perceive objects and self through psychological ownership-the feeling that a thing is MINE. Psychological ownership usually tracks legal ownership, but the two can and do diverge. In this integrative review, I propose a dual-process model of psychological ownership. Antecedents of psychological ownership form self-object associations prompting an implicit inference of psychological ownership, which can then be accepted, corrected, or rejected by explicit judgments. The model explains cases where psychological ownership and legal ownership conflict and predicts psychological ownership felt in a variety of relationships between people and objects, including objects they legally own and use, objects they use but do not legally own, and objects they legally own but do not use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.10.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

psychological ownership
28
objects legally
12
ownership
9
psychological
8
legal ownership
8
legally objects
8
objects
5
ownership implicit
4
implicit explicit
4
explicit object
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!