A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Diagnostic yield of fourth-generation endocytoscopy for esophageal squamous lesions using a modified endocytoscopic classification. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Endocytoscopy (EC) is an advanced endoscopy technique aimed at providing detailed histological assessments of esophageal lesions.
  • A study analyzed 2548 EC images from targeted areas to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a new fourth-generation EC using a modified classification system, with both expert and non-expert endoscopists reviewing the images.
  • Results showed high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing squamous cell cancer (SCC) and other lesions, indicating that fourth-generation EC is reliable for both experts and non-experts in detecting esophageal lesions.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Endocytoscopy (EC) is an ultra-high magnification endoscopy designed to provide in vivo histologic assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of the newly developed fourth-generation EC for esophageal squamous lesions by using a modified EC classification.

Methods: A total of 2548 EC images of 57 esophageal targeted areas between June 2015 and October 2017 were retrospectively collected. Two lesions with low-quality images were excluded. Only EC images were independently reviewed by two expert and two non-expert endoscopists. The lesions were classified according to a three-tier modified EC classification. We used a multilevel logistic regression to analyze the data.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing non-squamous cell cancer (SCC) vs SCC were 82.5% and 83.0% by the experts; 90.1% and 75.0% by non-experts. The interobserver agreement among the four raters was good (kappa statistic 0.59). The diagnostic accuracy of experts and non-experts was similar (P = 0.16 for specificity and P = 0.20 for sensitivity). The sensitivity and specificity of EC for non-neoplasia vs neoplasia were 88.7% and 74.6% by experts; 90.3 and 52.1% by non-experts. The interobserver agreement among the four raters was moderate (kappa statistic 0.44). The specificity of experts was higher compared to non-experts, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.08 for specificity and P = 0.93 for sensitivity).

Conclusions: Fourth-generation EC offers acceptable diagnostic accuracy and reliability in both experts and non-experts, especially when diagnosing SCC lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.13914DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic yield
8
esophageal squamous
8
squamous lesions
8
lesions modified
8
sensitivity specificity
8
non-experts interobserver
8
interobserver agreement
8
agreement raters
8
kappa statistic
8
diagnostic accuracy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!