AI Article Synopsis

  • The study highlights the importance of accurately measuring body fat in hemodialysis patients due to its clinical significance.
  • The research compares the accuracy of body fat percentage estimates using three methods: bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), sum of skinfolds (SSKD), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) among 317 chronic kidney disease patients.
  • Findings suggest that SSKD measurement aligns more closely with DEXA results overall, while BIA shows better compatibility in patients with higher body fat percentages.

Article Abstract

Introduction: body fat reflects important clinical impacts among hemodialysis patients; thus, simple and safe methods are required for a careful evaluation of this body compartment. Objectives: to evaluate the concordance of estimates of total body fat percentage (%BF), calculated using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and sum of four skinfolds (SSKD) measures, with those obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving hemodialysis. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted in 317 patients undergoing hemodialysis. The %BF was evaluated using BIA, SSKD measurement, and DEXA, and stratified by sex and tertiles. The Wilcoxon test for paired samples was used to compare the %BF obtained using the different methods, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC-L) to evaluate concordance. Results: the average %BF estimated using DEXA was 29.3 ± 9.3 %, with significant differences among the three methods (p < 0.05). SSKD measurement presented a higher CCC-L concordance with DEXA, regardless of sex. After stratification of the sample in tertiles, BIA presented a higher CCC-L concordance with DEXA among the patients with CKD with a %BF above 34.4 % (third tertile). Conversely, SSKD measurement presented better concordance with DEXA for those with a %BF equal to or less than 34.4 %. Conclusions: in terms of the estimates of the %BF, SSKD measurement displayed a better concordance with DEXA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.03338DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sskd measurement
16
concordance dexa
16
body fat
12
sum skinfolds
8
total body
8
patients chronic
8
chronic kidney
8
kidney disease
8
undergoing hemodialysis
8
evaluate concordance
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study highlights the importance of accurately measuring body fat in hemodialysis patients due to its clinical significance.
  • The research compares the accuracy of body fat percentage estimates using three methods: bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), sum of skinfolds (SSKD), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) among 317 chronic kidney disease patients.
  • Findings suggest that SSKD measurement aligns more closely with DEXA results overall, while BIA shows better compatibility in patients with higher body fat percentages.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!