Purpose: To compare the visual outcome and refractive results between presbyopic photorefractive keratectomy (presbyPRK) and presbyopic laser in situ keratomileusis (presbyLASIK) in presbyopic hyperopic patients using micromonovision and the SUPRACOR algorithm.
Setting: Percy Military Hospital and private Laser Victor Hugo Center, France.
Design: Observational retrospective nonrandomized.
Methods: Twenty-three patients who had undergone presbyPRK or presbyLASIK were included and followed up for 12-months. Far and near visual acuity without correction in monocular and binocular, measurement of distance visual acuity with correction in monocular, evaluation of spherical equivalent (SE), aberrometry, and patient satisfaction were measured and analyzed in this study.
Results: The study included 26 eyes of 13 patients in the presbyLASIK group and 20 eyes of 10 patients in the presbyPRK group. The mean age was 55.43 ± 4.6 years. Uncorrected binocular distance visual acuity was 0.030 ± 0.05 logMAR in the presbyLASIK group and 0 logMAR in the presbyPRK group (P = .066). Binocular near visual acuity without correction was 0.21 ± 0.11 logMAR in the presbyLASIK group and 0.30 ± 0.15 logMAR in the presbyPRK group (P = .0398). For the dominant eyes, the SE was -0.08 ± 0.48 diopters (D) in the presbyLASIK group and 0.16 ± 0.82 D in the presbyPRK group (P = .3995). For nondominant eyes, the SE was -0.44 ± 0.50 D in the presbyLASIK group and 0.12 ± 0.65 D in the presbyPRK group (P = .0254).
Conclusions: PresbyPRK and presbyLASIK were comparable in efficacy, stability, predictability, and safety. PresbyPRK could be a safe and effective surgical alternative for the hyperopic presbyopic patient.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000544 | DOI Listing |
J Cataract Refract Surg
July 2021
From the Ophthalmology Department, Amiens University Hospital Center, Amiens, France (William, Benjamin); Laser Victor Hugo Center, Paris, France (Alain, Mikhael); Ophthalmology Department, King AbdulAziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (Hussein); Agence de la Biomedecine, Saint-Denis, France (Elias); Ophthalmology Department, Percy Military Hospital, Clamart, France (Françoise, Maxime, Mikhael).
Purpose: To compare the visual outcome and refractive results between presbyopic photorefractive keratectomy (presbyPRK) and presbyopic laser in situ keratomileusis (presbyLASIK) in presbyopic hyperopic patients using micromonovision and the SUPRACOR algorithm.
Setting: Percy Military Hospital and private Laser Victor Hugo Center, France.
Design: Observational retrospective nonrandomized.
Ophthalmol Ther
December 2020
Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery Department, VISSUM, Alicante, Spain.
Purpose: To perform a pilot evaluation of a novel pharmacological therapy for presbyopia in patients with previous corneal refractive surgery.
Methods: This interventional study included 130 presbyopic patients. The patients were divided into three groups: (1) LASIK group, which included patients with previous LASIK for myopia or hyperopia; (2) previous presbyopia surgery group, including patients with previous monovision or PresbyLASIK (PresbyMAX, SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany); and (3) control group, which included presbyopes without any corneal refractive procedure.
Clin Ophthalmol
August 2016
Swiss Eye Research Foundation, Orasis Eye Clinic, Aargau, Reinach, Switzerland; Faculty of Physics, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia; Department of Ophthalmology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; Medical Faculty, Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia.
Purpose: To report the visual outcomes of the femtosecond laser-assisted multifocal aspheric corneal ablation profile using a mini-monovision approach and to evaluate if corneal multifocality was effective, and to report the relative benefits of this approach.
Patients And Methods: Bilateral femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis using a multifocal aspheric corneal ablation profile was performed on 19 hyperopic patients (38 eyes). They were divided into two groups based on eye dominance: dominant eye (DE) group targeting emmetropia and the nondominant eye (NDE) group targeting -0.
J Fr Ophtalmol
April 2015
Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital d'instruction des armées-Percy, 101, avenue Henri-Barbusse, 92141 Clamart cedex, France.
Introduction: The management of presbyopic patients is a medical, surgical and economic issue. We wondered which procedure, whether a Presbylasik technique called Regular Supracor or the intraocular surgery of clear lens replacement by a trifocal diffractive lens (presbyopic lens exchange [Prelex]), provided the best results (in visual acuity and satisfaction) for our hyperopic and presbyopic patients between 55 and 70. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the two techniques (at one week and three months) and to assess patients' quality of life.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCornea
June 2015
Cornea and Anterior Segment Department, Clinica Oftalnova, Desp. 198-199, Centro Medico Teknon, Calle Vilana, Barcelona, Spain.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to report visual, topographic, and satisfaction comparative results between symmetrical and asymmetrical presbyLASIK after 18 months.
Methods: Longitudinal, comparative case series of hyperopic presbyopes who underwent presbyLASIK, in a private clinical setting. Monovision symmetrical (plano target both eyes) versus asymmetrical [dominant eye (DE) = plano target; nondominant eye (NDE) = -0.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!