Reverse Dynamization Accelerates Bone-Healing in a Large-Animal Osteotomy Model.

J Bone Joint Surg Am

Center for Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.

Published: February 2021

Background: Reverse dynamization is a mechanical manipulation regimen designed to accelerate bone-healing and remodeling. It is based on the hypothesis that a fracture that is initially stabilized less rigidly allows micromotion to encourage initial cartilaginous callus formation. Once substantial callus has formed, the stabilization should then be converted to a rigid configuration to prevent the disruption of neovascularization. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether bone-healing can be accelerated using a regimen of reverse dynamization in a large-animal osteotomy model.

Methods: Transverse 2-mm tibial osteotomies were created in 18 goats, stabilized using circular external fixation, and divided into groups of 6 goats each: static fixation (rigid fixation), dynamic fixation (continuous micromotion using dynamizers), and reverse dynamization (initial micromotion using dynamizers followed by rigid fixation at 3 weeks postoperatively). Healing was assessed with the use of radiographs, micro-computed tomography, and mechanical testing.

Results: Radiographic evaluation showed earlier and more robust callus formation in the dynamic fixation and reverse dynamization groups compared with the static fixation group. After 8 weeks of treatment, the reverse dynamization group had reduced callus size, less bone volume, higher bone mineral density, and no evidence of radiolucent lines compared with the static fixation and dynamic fixation groups. This appearance is characteristic of advanced remodeling, returning closest to the values of intact bone. Moreover, the tibiae in the reverse dynamization group were significantly stronger in torsion compared with those in the static fixation and dynamic fixation groups.

Conclusions: These findings confirmed that tibial osteotomies under reverse dynamization healed faster, healed objectively better, and were considerably stronger, all suggesting an accelerated healing and remodeling process.

Clinical Relevance: This study demonstrates that the concept of reverse dynamization challenges the current understanding regarding the optimal fixation stability necessary to maximize the regenerative capacity of bone-healing. When reverse dynamization is employed in the clinical setting, it may be able to improve the treatment of fractures by reducing the time to union and potentially lowering the risk of delayed union and nonunion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00380DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reverse dynamization
40
static fixation
16
dynamic fixation
16
fixation
12
fixation dynamic
12
compared static
12
reverse
10
dynamization
9
large-animal osteotomy
8
callus formation
8

Similar Publications

Orthopaedic surgeons routinely assess the biomechanical environment of a fracture to create a fixation construct that provides the appropriate amount of stability in efforts to optimize fracture healing. Emerging concepts and technologies including reverse dynamization, "smart plates" that measure construct strain, and FractSim software that models fracture strain represent recent developments in optimizing construct biomechanics to accelerate bone healing and minimize construct failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This article was updated on December 20, 2023, because of previous errors, which were discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. Figure 4 has been replaced with a figure that presents different p values. Also, on page 1943, the text that had read: "Quantitative microCT confirmed that the total volume of the regenerate in the RD group was much smaller compared with the SF (p = 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

At the 2021 annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, the Basic Science Focus Forum hosted its first ever debate-style symposium focused on biomechanics and fracture repair. The 3 subjects of debate were "Mechanics versus Biology-Which is 'More Important' to Consider?" "Locked Plate versus Forward Dynamization versus Reverse Dynamization-Which Way Should I Go?" and "Sawbones versus Cadaver Models-What Should I Believe Most?" These debates were held because fracture healing is a highly organized synergistic response between biological factors and the local mechanical environment. Multiple studies have demonstrated that both factors play roles in governing bone healing responses, and the causal relationships between the 2 remain unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Current surgical fracture treatment paradigms, which use rigid metallic constructs to heal bones, provide reasonable clinical outcomes; however, they do not leverage recent advances in our understanding of bone healing and mechanotransduction throughout bone healing. The objective of this review was to investigate the efficacy and potential clinical applicability of surgical techniques and implants that deliberately introduce interfragmentary motion throughout the healing process.

Methods: The authors searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases for articles reporting on fracture repair using dynamic locking plates, dynamized surgical techniques, and reverse dynamization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

There are numerous animal models available to study bone healing as well as test strategies to accelerate bone formation. Sheep are commonly used for evaluation of long bone fractures due to similar dimensions and weight bearing environments compared to patients. Large critical-size defects can be created in sheep to facilitate the study of implantable materials, osteogenic proteins, and stem cell treatments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!