Objective: To compare nodule enhancement on subtraction CT iodine maps to that on dual-energy CT iodine maps using CT datasets acquired simultaneously.

Methods: A previously-acquired set of lung subtraction and dual-energy CT maps consisting of thirty patients with 95 solid pulmonary nodules (≥4 mm diameter) was used. Nodules were annotated and segmented on CT angiography, and mean nodule enhancement in the iodine maps calculated. Three radiologists scored nodule visibility with both techniques on a 4-point scale.

Results: Mean nodule enhancement was higher (p < 0.001) at subtraction CT (34.9 ± 12.9 HU) than at dual-energy CT (25.4 ± 21.0 HU). Nodule enhancement at subtraction CT was judged more often to be "highly visible" for each observers (p < 0.001) with an area under the curve of 0.81.

Conclusions: Subtraction CT is able to depict iodine enhancement in pulmonary nodules better than dual-energy CT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109443DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nodule enhancement
16
iodine maps
12
enhancement subtraction
8
subtraction dual-energy
8
pulmonary nodule
4
enhancement
4
dual-energy comparison
4
comparison study
4
study objective
4
objective compare
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!