Background: The Turnaway Study was the first to follow women denied abortions because of state law or facility policy over five years. The study has found negative effects on women's socioeconomic status, physical health, and on their children's wellbeing. However, women did not suffer lasting mental health consequences, prompting questions about the effects of denial on women's emotions.
Methods: In this mixed methods study, we used quantitative and qualitative interview data from the Turnaway Study to offer insight into these findings. We surveyed 161 women who were denied abortions at 30 facilities across the United States between 2008 and 2010 one week after the abortion denial and semiannually over five years. Mixed-effects regression analyses examined emotions about having been denied the abortion over time. To contextualize the quantitative findings, we draw on in-depth qualitative interviews with 15 participants, conducted in 2014-2015, for their accounts of their emotions and feelings over time.
Results: Survey participants reported both negative and positive emotions about the abortion denial one week after. Emotions became significantly less negative and more positive over their pregnancy and after childbirth. In multivariable models, lower social support, more difficulty deciding to seek abortion, and placing the baby for adoption were associated with reporting more negative emotions. Interviews revealed how, for some, belief in antiabortion narratives contributed to initial positive emotions. Subsequent positive life events and bonding with the child also led to positive retrospective evaluations of the denial.
Conclusions: Findings of emergent positive emotions about having been denied an abortion suggest that individuals are able to cope emotionally with an abortion denial, although evidence that policies leading to abortion denial cause significant health and socioeconomic harms remains.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113567 | DOI Listing |
Soc Sci Med
November 2024
UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
The World Health Organization's Abortion Care Guideline requires abortion care to be not only safe but also effective, efficient, accessible, equitable, acceptable, and person centered. We synthesized qualitative evidence from 111 papers from 42 countries selected from a systematic search of literature published between January 1996 and September 2023. We developed a typology of experiences experienced by abortion seekers engaging with facility-based abortion care services at any stage of the abortion care pathway; factors that modify the experience as well as the consequences of these experiences for the abortion seeker.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Public Health
November 2024
Beshi King Development Services, Abuja, Nigeria.
Background: Abortion is largely restricted in Liberia and Sierra Leone, with exceptions under limited conditions. Consequently, women and girls seeking induced abortion care in these settings resort to unsafe methods, resulting in severe complications. Post-abortion care (PAC) is a lifesaving obstetric intervention to address abortion-related complications, but access to quality and comprehensive PAC in health facilities is daunting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRecenti Prog Med
November 2024
Medico, anestesista-rianimatore.
Recently, talking about abortion, the Pope has spoken harshly regarding the role played by non-objecting doctors. The article discusses: 1) the ethical and health aspects that the denial of the right to terminate pregnancy entails; 2) the positive results obtained by non-objecting doctors 50 years after the implementation of Law no. 194/1978, in terms of safeguarding women's health and guaranteeing the implementation of a state law.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCan J Health Hist
April 2024
Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Through the late-twentieth century, physicians endorsed the denial of life-saving surgeries to infants because they had Down syndrome. Grim physician assessments of the inevitable burden of Down syndrome found ideological footing in the 1970s crusade to eradicate the condition, a public health goal made possible by new genetic diagnostics and a weakened abortion law. What is most striking about this physician-sanctioned passive euthanasia is that it persisted even in an era of unprecedented expansion of disability rights.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Health Polit Policy Law
February 2025
Context: In the United States, fetal development markers, including "viability" and the point when a fetus can "feel pain," have permeated the social imaginary of abortion, affecting public support for abortion and the legality and availability of care, but the extent to which these markers describe and orient the experience of abortion at later gestations is unclear.
Methods: Using interviews with 30 cisgender women in the United States who obtained an abortion after 24 weeks of pregnancy, the authors investigated whether and how notions of fetal viability and/or pain operated in the women's lived experiences of pregnancy and abortion.
Findings: According to respondents' accounts, fetal development-based laws restricting abortion based on purported points of fetal development operated as gestational limits, privileged the viability and pain status of the fetus over that of the prospective neonate, and failed to account for the viability and pain of the pregnant person.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!