Background: Pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including increased rates of caesarean section birth, macrosomia, congenital malformation, prematurity, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and stillbirth. As a result, there has been an increase in interventions to improve outcomes in both mother and infant. To date, meaningful comparisons between these studies are limited due to heterogeneity in outcome selection and reporting. The aim of this study is to develop a core outcome set (COS) for randomised controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of pregnant women with PGDM.
Methods: The study consists of three steps. The first step is a systematic review of the literature to assess outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of pregnant women with PGDM. The second step is a three round, online Delphi survey to prioritise these outcomes. In this step, stakeholders (including women with PGDM, healthcare workers, researchers and policymakers) will be asked to rank the importance of outcomes for inclusion in the COS using a 9-point Likert type scale. Outcomes that meet the inclusion criteria after completion of the Delphi surveys will be brought to the consensus meeting. The consensus meeting will be the third and final step, where the COS will be finalised. The consensus meeting will include members from each stakeholder group.
Discussion: This paper describes the process used to develop a COS for the reporting of studies evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in pregnant women with PGDM. The COS will enable greater comparison between and information synthesis across RCTs in the treatment of PGDM. In addition, this COS will also help improve trial reporting and minimise research waste by prioritising the collection and reporting of outcomes that matter to all relevant stakeholder groups.
Trial Registration: This COS has been registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative ( http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/1425 ) on the 4th of November 2019. The systematic review component of this study has also been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020173549 ).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730783 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04910-1 | DOI Listing |
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
January 2025
Editorial Board of Jiangsu Medical Journal, the First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus is hyperglycemia in special populations (pregnant women), however gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) not only affects maternal health, but also has profound effects on offspring health. The prevalence of gestational diabetes in my country is gradually increasing.
Objective: To study the application effect of self-transcendence nursing model in GDM patients.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi
January 2025
Hospital Administration Office, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing100026, China.
To investigate the impact of preconception body mass index (BMI) on neonatal birth weight and the risk of macrosomia in pregnant women across various age groups. A cohort study was conducted, selecting pregnant women who underwent their initial prenatal assessment at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from September 1st, 2018 to March 31st, 2020. Relevant data were collected from the hospital's electronic medical record system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGynecol Obstet Fertil Senol
January 2025
Service d'obstétrique et médecine fœtale, CHRU de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France; INSERM U1254, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. Electronic address:
Objective: To study the sexuality of pregnant women after Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART).
Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study based on two questionnaires: the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Couple Satisfaction Index 32 (CSI 32). Two groups were compared: pregnancies following ART and spontaneous pregnancies.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM
January 2025
Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, 101 Dudley Street, Providence, RI 02905.
Objective: To systematically evaluate inpatient interventions to reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, or stress in pregnant individuals during antepartum hospitalization.
Data Sources: Searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PsycINFO from database inception through April 2023.
Study Eligibility Criteria: Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if an intervention was compared to treatment as usual (TAU) to reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, or stress among pregnant individuals admitted to a hospital's antepartum unit.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
January 2025
Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine Unit, CHRU of Nancy, Nancy, France; Department of Fetopathology and Placental Pathology, CHRU of Nancy, Nancy, France; Inserm, Diagnostic and Interventional Adaptive Imaging, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France. Electronic address:
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of fetal MRI in prenatal diagnosis.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, including all pregnant women who underwent fetal MRI at a single French university center from 2018 to 2022. Fetal MRI findings were deemed "concordant" if they matched the ultrasound diagnosis.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!