Background And Aims: Multiple-choice questions (MCQ) in the anatomical sciences are often perceived to be targeting recall of facts and regurgitation of trivial details. Moving away from this assumption requires the design of purposeful multiple-choice questions that focus on higher-order cognitive functions as opposed to rote memorization. In order to develop such questions, it was important to first understand the strategies that students use in solving multiple-choice questions. Using the think-aloud protocol, this study seeks to understand strategies students use in solving multiple-choice questions. Specifically, it seeks to uncover patterns in the reasoning process and tactics used when solving higher and lower order MCQ in anatomy. The research also provides insights onto how these strategies influence the student's probability of answering questions correctly.
Methods: Multiple-choice questions were created at three levels of cognitive functioning based on the ideas, connections, extensions (ICE) learning framework. The think-aloud protocol was used to unravel problem-solving strategies used by 92 undergraduate anatomy students as they solved multiple-choice questions.
Results: Sixteen strategies were identified through the oral and written think-alouds that students used to solve MCQ. Eleven of these have been described and supported by the literature, while the rest were utilized by our students when solving MCQ in anatomy. Domain-specific strategies of visualizing and recalling had the highest use. Personal connection was a strategy that allowed students to achieve success in all ICE levels in the oral think-alouds and in the I and E levels in the written think-alouds.
Conclusions: This research argues that it is upon us as educators to make learning visible to our students, specifically through the use of think-alouds. It also raises awareness that when educators facilitate the process of students making personal connections, it aids students in new knowledge being integrated effectively and retrieved accurately.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714269 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.209 | DOI Listing |
Background And Aims: Survey based studies show a high prevalence of endoscopy related injury (ERI). This survey aims to provide data regarding the type of design changes to the colonoscope that would be most beneficial for gastroenterologists and facilitate user-centered design changes.
Methods: A 26-item anonymous, electronic, multiple-choice survey was answered by 455 gastroenterologists.
BMC Med Educ
January 2025
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), University Hospital and University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Background: Research shows that trauma team formation could potentially improve effectiveness of injury care in rural settings. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of rural trauma team training amongst medical trainees and traffic law enforcement professionals in Uganda.
Methods: Prospective multi-centre interrupted time series analysis of an interventional training based on the 4th edition of rural trauma team development course of the American College of Surgeons.
PLoS One
January 2025
Faculty of Dentistry, PHENIKAA University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the performance of the latest large language models (LLMs) in answering dental multiple choice questions (MCQs), including both text-based and image-based questions.
Material And Methods: A total of 1490 MCQs from two board review books for the United States National Board Dental Examination were selected. This study evaluated six of the latest LLMs as of August 2024, including ChatGPT 4.
JVS Vasc Insights
October 2024
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh.
Objective: Antithrombotic therapy improves endovascular intervention outcomes for peripheral artery disease. However, there are limited data guiding the choice and duration of these adjuvant therapies. Thus, we explored current antithrombotic prescribing preferences among vascular interventionalists, hypothesizing that there are varied and inconsistent treatment practices among providers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Inj
January 2025
Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized our capacity to examine brain alterations in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, little is known about the level of implementation of MRI techniques in clinical practice in TBI and associated obstacles.
Methods: A diverse set of health professionals completed 19 multiple choice and free text survey questions.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!