A real-time PCR assay for rapid identification of inducible and acquired clarithromycin resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus.

BMC Infect Dis

National Reference Centre for Mycobacteriology, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, 1015 Arlington St, R3E 3R2, Winnipeg, Canada.

Published: December 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • - Mycobacterium abscessus causes severe infections and has dual resistance mechanisms to macrolide antibiotics like clarithromycin, making treatment challenging due to the presence of erm(41) and rrl gene mutations.
  • - The study developed a real-time PCR assay that effectively detects both types of antibiotic resistance in M. abscessus, showing high correlation with traditional methods.
  • - Findings indicated that real-time PCR is a more reliable method for identifying clarithromycin resistance, especially when dealing with mixed genotypes in samples, achieving 100% agreement with sequencing results in this study.

Article Abstract

Background: Mycobacterium abscessus is a rapidly growing mycobacteria involved in severe infections of the lung, skin, or soft tissue. Macrolides such as clarithromycin are the recommended first line drugs for treatment of M. abscessus infections. However, M. abscessus has dual mechanisms of resistance to macrolides, making treatment by macrolides difficult. A functional erm(41) gene confers for inducible resistance while acquired mutations on the 23S rRNA rrl gene confer for constitutive resistance.

Methods: We have developed a real-time PCR assay to detect both inducible and acquired resistance to clarithromycin, and compared the results to traditional erm(41) and rrl sequencing and phenotypic susceptibility testing using Sensititre™ plates.

Results: Of the total 126 M. abscessus isolates tested, truncated erm(41) was found in 23/126 (18.3%) of the samples, 27/126 (21.4%) had a T28C mutation in erm(41), and 2/126 (1.6%) had an acquired A2058C mutation in rrl. The phenotypic results correlated with the expected sequencing results in 121/126 samples (96%). Phenotypic testing compared to real-time PCR resolved 2 of these discrepancies by showing the existence of both erm(41) alleles in the isolates that sequencing missed. One culture was found to be mixed with two M. abscessus subsp. as per hsp65 sequencing and 2 isolates had discordance between molecular and phenotypic results. It was presumed that 3 isolates showed discrepancy between sequencing and real-time PCR, but one culture was mixed and other 2 detected both alleles by real-time PCR leading to 100% concordance when compared to sequencing.

Conclusion: In conclusion, real-time PCR is more accurate for detection of both acquired and induced clarithromycin resistance, specifically when mixed genic profiles are present in a sample.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730737PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05686-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

real-time pcr
24
pcr assay
8
inducible acquired
8
clarithromycin resistance
8
mycobacterium abscessus
8
culture mixed
8
real-time
6
abscessus
6
acquired
5
resistance
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!