AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of brachytherapy versus enucleation for managing choroidal melanoma in patients with varying tumor sizes, using data from the National Cancer Database.
  • Out of 7,096 patients, those treated with brachytherapy had significantly better 5-year overall survival rates compared to those undergoing enucleation across all tumor sizes; specifically, survival rates were 87% vs. 64% for small, 77% vs. 57% for medium, and 68% vs. 46% for large tumors respectively.
  • Factors like older age, more comorbidities, and tumor invasiveness were linked to poorer survival rates, while brachytherapy was associated

Article Abstract

Purpose: There is no current randomized data comparing the efficacy of brachytherapy and enucleation for patients with larger sized tumors. The purpose of the present study was to use a large, contemporary database to determine current practice patterns and compare survival outcomes between different management options for patients with choroidal melanoma of various sizes.

Material And Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2014) for histologically-confirmed choroidal melanoma for patients treated with brachytherapy versus enucleation. Chi-square test was used to compare categorized demographic and clinical variables in both arms. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards assessment determined variables associated with OS. Patients were divided into cohorts representing small, medium, and large tumors. Propensity scores matching (PSM) was utilized to compare more similar cohorts.

Results: A total of 7,096 patients met the selection criteria; 5,501 (78%) patients received brachytherapy and 1,595 (22%) patients were treated with enucleation. After PSM, 5-yr OS for small tumors was 87% vs. 64%, for medium tumors was 77% vs. 57%, and for large tumors was 68% vs. 46% for brachytherapy and enucleation, respectively ( < 0.001). Following PSM, multivariate Cox regression found older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.51-2.06), more comorbidities (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.25-1.70), extraocular extension (EOE) (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06-1.48), ciliary body invasion (CBI) (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.02-1.40), and larger size (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.40-1.66) were negative prognosticators of survival. Brachytherapy was a positive prognosticator of survival (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.40-0.51).

Conclusions: Patients selected for brachytherapy had improved survival compared to enucleation in all size cohorts. EOE and CBI are significantly higher in the enucleation cohort and are important negative prognosticators for survival selected against patients having brachytherapy. Brachytherapy is a reasonable treatment option for certain patients with large size tumors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7690235PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.98108DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients
10
brachytherapy
9
brachytherapy versus
8
versus enucleation
8
national cancer
8
cancer database
8
brachytherapy enucleation
8
choroidal melanoma
8
patients treated
8
large tumors
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!