AI Article Synopsis

  • COVID-19 resource re-allocation caused significant delays in care for cardiovascular and cancer patients, impacting scheduling, testing, and procedures for healthcare providers.
  • A survey involving 1,415 healthcare providers across 43 countries showed that 63% of oncologists and 92% of cardiologists experienced treatment or elective procedure cancellations, with many modifying their practices.
  • The findings highlight the need for improved telemedicine access, PPE availability, and active involvement of medical societies to enhance healthcare delivery during crises.

Article Abstract

Background: Re-allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in delays in care delivery to patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer. The ability of health care providers to provide optimal care in this setting has not been formally evaluated.

Objectives: To assess the impact of COVID-19 resource re-allocation on scheduling, testing, elective procedures, telemedicine access, use of new COVID-19 therapies, and providers' opinions on healthcare policies among oncology and cardiology practitioners.

Methods: An electronic survey was conducted by a cardio-oncology collaborative network through regional and state chapters of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Descriptive statistics were reported by frequency and proportion for analyses, and stratified categorically by geographic region and specialty.

Results: One thousand four hundred fifteen providers (43 countries) participated: 986 cardiologists, 306 oncologists, and 118 trainees/internal medicine. 63% (195/306) of oncologists vs 92% (896/976) of cardiologists reported cancellations of treatments/elective procedures (p = 0.01). 46% (442/970) of cardiologists and 25% (76/303) of oncologists modified the scope of their practice (p = < 0.001). Academic physicians (74.5%) felt better supplied with personal protective equipment (PPE) vs non-academic (74.5% vs 67.2%; p = 0.018). Telemedicine was less common in Europe 81% (74/91), and Latin America 64% (101/158), than the United States, 88% (950/1097) (p = < 0.001). 95% of all groups supported more active leadership from medical professional societies.

Conclusions: These results support initiatives to promote expanded coverage for telemedicine, increased access to PPE, better testing availability and involvement of medical professional societies to help with preparedness for future health care crisis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691954PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40959-020-00085-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

covid-19 pandemic
8
collaborative network
8
perspectives covid-19
4
pandemic impact
4
impact cardio-oncology
4
covid-19
4
cardio-oncology covid-19
4
covid-19 international
4
international collaborative
4
network survey
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!