AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates why some patients do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), identifying factors like mechanical dyssynchrony, scar tissue, and poor LV lead placement as potential causes.
  • Using Late Iodine Enhancement Computed Tomography (LIE-CT), researchers analyzed various factors in 29 patients over six months, finding that non-responders had worse dyssynchrony metrics and more unfavorable lead placements compared to responders.
  • The conclusions suggest that LIE-CT is a useful tool for understanding CRT non-response, potentially guiding future treatment strategies for these patients.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Causes of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) include mechanical dyssynchrony, myocardial scar, and suboptimal left ventricular (LV) lead location. We aimed to assess the utility of Late Iodine Enhancement Computed Tomography (LIE-CT) with image subtraction in characterizing CRT non-response.

Methods: CRT response was defined as a decrease in LV end-systolic volume > 15% at 6 months. LIE-CT was performed after 6 months, and analyzed global and segmental dyssynchrony, myocardial scar, coronary venous anatomy, and position of LV lead relative to scar and segment of latest mechanical contraction.

Results: We evaluated 29 patients (age 71 ± 12 years; 72% men) including 18 (62%) responders. All metrics evaluating residual dyssynchrony such as wall motion index and wall thickness index were worse in non-responders. There was no difference in presence and extent of scar between responders and non-responders. However, in non-responders, the LV lead was more often over an akinetic/dyskinetic area (72% vs. 22%, p = .007), a fibrotic area (64% vs. 8%, p = .0007), an area with myocardial thickness < 6 mm (82% vs. 22%, p = .002), and less often concordant with the region of maximal wall thickness (9% vs. 72%, p = .001). Among the 11 non-responders, eight had at least another coronary venous branch visualized by CT, including three (27%) coursing over a potentially interesting myocardial area (free of scar, with normal wall motion, and with a myocardial thickness ≥6 mm).

Conclusion: LIE-CT with image subtraction allows a comprehensive characterization of patients after CRT and may provide clues for management of non-responders.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14134DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-response cardiac
8
cardiac resynchronization
8
resynchronization therapy
8
computed tomography
8
dyssynchrony myocardial
8
myocardial scar
8
characterization non-response
4
therapy post-procedural
4
post-procedural computed
4
tomography introduction
4

Similar Publications

Background: Non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important issue in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-left bundle branch block (LBBB). Electrocardiogram-gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography imaging (G-MPI SPECT) is typically used to assess left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. This study aimed to determine whether G-MPI parameters are associated with non-responsiveness to CRT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) offers significant benefits in symptom alleviation, reduction of rehospitalization rates, and overall survival of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (rEF). However, despite its proven efficacy, precisely identifying suitable CRT candidates remains a challenge, with a notable proportion of patients experiencing non-response. Accordingly, many attempts have been made to enhance patient selection, and to identify the best imaging parameters to predict the response and survival after CRT implantation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Biventricular pacing (BiVP) has been the cornerstone of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in the management of symptomatic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and electrical dyssynchrony despite guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). However, BiVP has some limitations, including technical difficulties and high non-response rates. Conduction system pacing encompassing His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently emerged as a promising alternative to CRT in this group of patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for heart failure (HF) in approximately two-thirds of recipients, with a third remaining CRT 'non-responders.' There is an increasing body of evidence exploring the reasons behind non-response, as well as ways to preempt or counteract it.

Areas Covered: This review will examine the most recent evidence regarding optimizing outcomes from CRT, as well as explore whether traditional CRT indeed remains the best first-line therapy for electrical resynchronization in HF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to understand the outcomes of patients experiencing worsening heart failure (WHF) while receiving outpatient treatment and to identify factors linked to poor responses to loop diuretics.
  • Between September 2022 and March 2023, 44 patients with WHF symptoms were monitored weekly; improvements in symptoms and quality of life were noted, but certain biomarkers indicated a risk for poor diuretic response.
  • High levels of cystatin C, NT-proBNP, and troponin T were found to be strong indicators of inadequate response to fluid treatment in these patients, suggesting a need for alternative therapies for those affected.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!