In the field of physical therapy, there is debate as to the clinical utility of premanipulative vascular assessments. Cervical artery dysfunction (CAD) risk assessment involves a multi-system approach to differentiate between spontaneous versus mechanical events. The purposes of this inductive analysis of the literature are to discuss the link between cervical spine manipulation (CSM) and CAD, to examine the literature on premanipulative vascular tests, and to suggest an optimal sequence of premanipulative testing based on the differentiation of a spontaneous versus mechanical vascular event. Knowing what premanipulative vascular tests assess and the associated clinical application facilitates an evidence-informed decision for clinical application of vascular assessment before CSM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7708008PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.32.775DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

premanipulative vascular
12
premanipulative testing
8
physical therapy
8
spontaneous versus
8
versus mechanical
8
vascular tests
8
clinical application
8
premanipulative
5
vascular
5
proposing algorithm
4

Similar Publications

Strain of the vertebral artery during passive neck movements and spinal manipulation of the cervical spine: An observational study.

J Bodyw Mov Ther

October 2024

Faculty of Kinesiology, Human Performance Lab KNB 404, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. Electronic address:

Background: Neck pain is a common condition, and a frequent treatment is chiropractic cervical spinal manipulation therapy (cSMT). However, cervical spinal manipulations have been associated with excessive cervical artery elongations, allegedly causing arterial dissection leading to stroke.

Purpose: The primary purpose of this study was to quantify the total vertebral artery elongations during cSMT, and secondarily, quantify the vertebral artery elongations during the pre-manipulative orientation of the head and neck and the subsequent elongations during the actual thrust.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Manual joint mobilization and manipulation are recommended therapeutic interventions for people with neck pain. High-velocity thrust and sustained techniques have an uncertain association with serious arterial trauma. The validity of pre-manipulative tests of the cervical spine is often questioned, and the understanding of the effect of head/neck position on blood flow is still incomplete.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the field of physical therapy, there is debate as to the clinical utility of premanipulative vascular assessments. Cervical artery dysfunction (CAD) risk assessment involves a multi-system approach to differentiate between spontaneous versus mechanical events. The purposes of this inductive analysis of the literature are to discuss the link between cervical spine manipulation (CSM) and CAD, to examine the literature on premanipulative vascular tests, and to suggest an optimal sequence of premanipulative testing based on the differentiation of a spontaneous versus mechanical vascular event.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Eagle's syndrome, elongated styloid process and new evidence for pre-manipulative precautions for potential cervical arterial dysfunction.

Musculoskelet Sci Pract

December 2020

Program Director, MAPS Accredited Fellowship in Orthopedic Manual Therapy, Cutchogue, NY, 11935, USA. Electronic address:

Introduction: Safety with upper cervical interventions is a frequently discussed and updated concern for physical therapists, chiropractors and osteopaths. IFOMPT developed the framework for safety assessment of the cervical spine, and this topic has been discussed in-depth with past masterclasses characterizing carotid artery dissection and cervical arterial dysfunction. Our masterclass will expand on this information with knowledge of specific anatomical anomalies found to produce Eagle's syndrome, and cause carotid artery dissection, stroke and even death.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Yes, we should abandon pre-treatment positional testing of the cervical spine.

Musculoskelet Sci Pract

October 2020

Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Article Synopsis
  • There is no proven link between cervical spine manipulation and major adverse events (MAE), but manual therapists should still aim to avoid potential risks.
  • Despite recent recommendations, the validity of tests for vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) is low, as they often yield false negatives and aren't reliable indicators of serious neurovascular issues.
  • Patient interviews can effectively identify VBI symptoms and should be prioritized over ineffective VBI tests, which may wrongly suggest that a negative result means it's safe to proceed with manipulation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!