Background: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) recently became the most frequently performed bariatric surgery (BS) worldwide, overtaking the long-time standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Main indications for one or the other procedure show large inter-center variations and warrant further investigations.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the influencers of primary BS selection in Switzerland.

Setting: Switzerland.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of all hospitalizations in Switzerland January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2017 with anonymized data provided by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office. BS procedures were identified based on ICD-10 and national surgical codes. Statistical analyses were performed with R.

Results: During the study period 27,375 BS were performed. The annual BS caseload doubled over time, whereas inpatient complications decreased (∼-33%). RYGB was the prevailing procedure, although its annual proportion decreased from 80% to 70% over 7 years. Meanwhile, use of SG increased from 14% to 23%. Primary RYGB and SG had similar rates of inpatient mortality (∼.05%) and morbidity (8.0 versus 7.4%, P =.148), with the exception of higher ileus rates following RYGB (.7 versus .1%, P < .001). Patient-related factors favoring the indication of SG were male sex, extremes of age, and metabolic co-morbidities , while gastroesophageal reflux disease and private insurance-favored RYGB. Strikingly, differences between geographic regions outweighed patient-related factors in procedure selection: inhabitants of German- and Italian-speaking areas had higher likelihood (OR 4.6; 3.9, P < .001) to receive SG than those in French-speaking areas.

Conclusion: Geographic differences in primary BS procedure selection indicate a lack of objective rationales. Long-term risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to assist evidence-based decision making.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.10.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sleeve gastrectomy
8
gastric bypass
8
bariatric surgery
8
patient-related factors
8
procedure selection
8
rygb
5
gastrectomy gastric
4
bypass "post-code"
4
"post-code" lottery?
4
lottery? comprehensive
4

Similar Publications

Background: Among bariatric surgeries, laparoscopic sleeve gastrostomy (LSG) has gained good global acceptance, but this surgery, like any other invasive procedure, has side effects. Various techniques have been tested to reduce these complications, which are used under the title of stapler line reinforcement (SLR). The purpose of this research is to compare the bleeding, leakage, mortality, food intolerance, re-hospitalization, and post-operative invasive therapeutic interventions in LSG surgery in two groups with and without omentopexy method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is increasingly used for obesity and metabolic disease, with safety profiles showing it is among the safest major operations. The last 20 + years have noted significantly improved safety that has been accompanied by decreasing length of stay and select populations electing for outpatient surgery, leading to continued decreases in cost. Regardless, readmissions and complications still occur, requiring inpatient postoperative care (IP-POC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

For patients considering bariatric surgery, it is essential to have clear answers to common questions to ensure the success of the procedure. Patients should understand that surgery is not a quick fix but a tool that must be complemented by lifestyle changes, including dietary adjustments and regular physical activity. The procedure carries potential risks that should be weighed against the potential benefits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To investigate the effect of weight loss and metabolic improvement after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in older adults aged 65 years or over compared with younger adults in a retrospective analysis.

Methods: The J-SMART study database of 322 Japanese individuals with body mass index (BMI) ≥32 kg/m who underwent LSG between 2011 and 2014 at 10 centers accredited by the Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity were analyzed. The subjects were classified into two groups: ≥65 age group (range, 65-76 years; n = 25) and <65 age group (range, 22-64 years; n = 297).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!