A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome: Findings from a Large Northern California Cohort. | LitMetric

Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome: Findings from a Large Northern California Cohort.

Ophthalmol Retina

Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California. Electronic address:

Published: September 2021

Purpose: To report the clinical and imaging characteristics of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) from a large single-center cohort.

Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Participants: A total of 111 patients previously diagnosed with MEWDS in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California system from 2012 to 2019.

Methods: Two retina specialists reviewed the medical records and all available retinal imaging, including Humphrey visual field testing, fundus photography (FP), OCT, fluorescein angiogram (FA), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF). Patients were excluded from analysis if confirmatory imaging was unavailable.

Main Outcome Measures: Patient characteristics, visual acuity, clinical examination and imaging findings, and final diagnosis.

Results: Seventy-three patients (65.8%) were confirmed to have the diagnosis of MEWDS. Fifty-eight (79.5%) were female, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age at presentation of 35.2 (14.2) years, and mean refractive error of -1.6 diopters. Initial mean (SD) visual acuity was logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.39 (0.31) and improved to mean (SD) logMAR 0.07 (0.15) at final follow-up. Presenting symptoms included blurred vision (82%), scotomas (56%), photopsias (43%), and floaters (23%). Nine patients (12%) had a previously diagnosed autoimmune condition, and 2 patients (3%) had documentation of a recent vaccination. Antecedent upper respiratory infection was documented in 15 of 66 patients (23%). Noted clinical and imaging features include ellipsoid zone disruption (100%), white fundus lesions (92%), FA hyperfluorescence (92%), foveal granularity (74%), vitreous cell (53%), and optic disc edema (52%). Twenty-nine of the 111 patients (26%) were initially misdiagnosed with MEWDS and subsequently given an alternative diagnosis, including other white dot syndromes, syphilis, primary vitreoretinal lymphoma, myopic degeneration, and central serous chorioretinopathy.

Conclusions: Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome is a rare self-limiting condition of the outer retina. Although a distinct set of clinical exam and imaging findings permit recognition of this disease, misdiagnosis is not uncommon.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2020.11.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

white dot
16
multiple evanescent
12
evanescent white
12
dot syndrome
12
northern california
8
clinical imaging
8
111 patients
8
visual acuity
8
imaging findings
8
patients
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!