Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To report the clinical and imaging characteristics of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) from a large single-center cohort.
Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study.
Participants: A total of 111 patients previously diagnosed with MEWDS in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California system from 2012 to 2019.
Methods: Two retina specialists reviewed the medical records and all available retinal imaging, including Humphrey visual field testing, fundus photography (FP), OCT, fluorescein angiogram (FA), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF). Patients were excluded from analysis if confirmatory imaging was unavailable.
Main Outcome Measures: Patient characteristics, visual acuity, clinical examination and imaging findings, and final diagnosis.
Results: Seventy-three patients (65.8%) were confirmed to have the diagnosis of MEWDS. Fifty-eight (79.5%) were female, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age at presentation of 35.2 (14.2) years, and mean refractive error of -1.6 diopters. Initial mean (SD) visual acuity was logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.39 (0.31) and improved to mean (SD) logMAR 0.07 (0.15) at final follow-up. Presenting symptoms included blurred vision (82%), scotomas (56%), photopsias (43%), and floaters (23%). Nine patients (12%) had a previously diagnosed autoimmune condition, and 2 patients (3%) had documentation of a recent vaccination. Antecedent upper respiratory infection was documented in 15 of 66 patients (23%). Noted clinical and imaging features include ellipsoid zone disruption (100%), white fundus lesions (92%), FA hyperfluorescence (92%), foveal granularity (74%), vitreous cell (53%), and optic disc edema (52%). Twenty-nine of the 111 patients (26%) were initially misdiagnosed with MEWDS and subsequently given an alternative diagnosis, including other white dot syndromes, syphilis, primary vitreoretinal lymphoma, myopic degeneration, and central serous chorioretinopathy.
Conclusions: Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome is a rare self-limiting condition of the outer retina. Although a distinct set of clinical exam and imaging findings permit recognition of this disease, misdiagnosis is not uncommon.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2020.11.016 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!