A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Where are we? | LitMetric

Objectives: Fifty percent of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients succumb from metastatic disease despite radical cystectomy (RC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) randomized clinical trials (RCT) investigated whether peri-operative chemotherapy improves survival. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are explored as peri-operative single agent, ICI-ICI or ICI-chemotherapy combinations. Our goal is to provide the status of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment in MIBC.

Methods: The literature on NAC and ACT trials in MIBC was reviewed.

Results: Since the 1980s, NAC RCTs were performed in cisplatin-fit patients, mainly using cisplatin combination chemotherapy. Meta-analyses indicated a small, but significant 5% improvement in overall survival in T2-T4N0M0 MIBC patients. Mostly MVAC or gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) regimens were used without clear benefit of one regimen over the other. NAC value in N+MIBC is not established and predictive value of associated~25-40% complete downstaging (pathologically confirmed complete regression, pCR) not unequivocally demonstrated. Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy RCTs were smaller, some prematurely stopped for poor accrual, and underpowered to demonstrate clear statistical evidence for a 5% overall survival advantage in pT3-T4N1-3M0 MIBC. Novel neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors, alone or with chemotherapy, phase 2 trials demonstrate down staging and encouraging clinical results.

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant MVAC or GC in cT2-T4N0 MIBC patients fit for cisplatin is still recommended based on OS benefit shown in meta-analyses, butreal-world adherence to NAC is low as ~40-50% ofpatients are unfit for cisplatin. The value of neoadjuvant treatment in node-positive MIBC is not clearly demonstrated requiring more accurate clinical staging and prospective studies. Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy may be considered in selected, chemo-naïve pT3-T4N+patients. Results from prospective checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy RCTs are needed before immunotherapy becomes a recommended alternative for peri-operative treatment. Molecular tumour subtyping will support selecting novel agents for neoadjuvant or adjuvant strategies.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neoadjuvant adjuvant
12
mibc patients
12
muscle-invasive bladder
8
bladder cancer
8
immune checkpoint
8
checkpoint inhibitors
8
adjuvant cisplatin-based
8
cisplatin-based chemotherapy
8
neoadjuvant
7
chemotherapy
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!