Purpose: The purpose of this work was to report on the geometric uncertainty for patients treated with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) tracking for lung SABR to verify the accuracy of the system.
Methods: Seventeen patients were treated as part of the MLC tracking for lung SABR clinical trial using electromagnetic beacons implanted around the tumor acting as a surrogate for target motion. Sources of uncertainties evaluated in the study included the surrogate-target positional uncertainty, the beam-surrogate tracking uncertainty, the surrogate localization uncertainty, and the target delineation uncertainty. Probability density functions (PDFs) for each source of uncertainty were constructed for the cohort and each patient. The total PDFs was computed using a convolution approach. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to quantify these uncertainties.
Results: For the cohort, the surrogate-target positional uncertainty 95% CIs were ±2.5 mm (-2.0/3.0 mm) in left-right (LR), ±3.0 mm (-1.6/4.5 mm) in superior-inferior (SI) and ±2.0 mm (-1.8/2.1 mm) in anterior-posterior (AP). The beam-surrogate tracking uncertainty 95% CIs were ±2.1 mm (-2.1/2.1 mm) in LR, ±2.8 mm (-2.8/2.7 mm) in SI and ±2.1 mm (-2.1/2.0 mm) in AP directions. The surrogate localization uncertainty minimally impacted the total PDF with a width of ±0.6 mm. The target delineation uncertainty distribution 95% CIs were ±5.4 mm. For the total PDF, the 95% CIs were ±5.9 mm (-5.8/6.0 mm) in LR, ±6.7 mm (-5.8/7.5 mm) in SI and ±6.0 mm (-5.5/6.5 mm) in AP.
Conclusion: This work reports the geometric uncertainty of MLC tracking for lung SABR by accounting for the main sources of uncertainties that occurred during treatment. The overall geometric uncertainty is within ±6.0 mm in LR and AP directions and ±6.7 mm in SI. The dominant uncertainty was the target delineation uncertainty. This geometric analysis helps put into context the range of uncertainties that may be expected during MLC tracking for lung SABR (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02514512).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abb0c6 | DOI Listing |
Commun Biol
December 2024
Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
This study focuses on refining growth-rate-based drug response metrics for patient-derived tumor organoid screening using brightfield live-cell imaging. Traditional metrics like Normalized Growth Rate Inhibition (GR) and Normalized Drug Response (NDR) have been used to assess organoid responses to anticancer treatments but face limitations in accurately quantifying cytostatic and cytotoxic effects across varying growth rates. Here, we introduce the Normalized Organoid Growth Rate (NOGR) metric, specifically developed for brightfield imaging-based assays.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStem Cell Res Ther
October 2024
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-Ro, Bundang-Gu, 463-707, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol
August 2024
Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Toronto, Toronto M5G 1V7, Canada.
Background: Canada has one of the highest incidences of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide. CRC screening improves CRC outcomes and is cost-effective. This study compares Canadian CRC screening programs using essential elements of an organized screening program outlined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Appl Clin Med Phys
August 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Purpose: This study presents a novel and comprehensive framework for evaluating magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) workflow by integrating the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) approach with Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC). We assess the workflow for safety, quality, and economic implications, providing a holistic understanding of the MRgRT implementation. The aim is to offer valuable insights to healthcare practitioners and administrators, facilitating informed decision-making regarding the 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Phys
April 2024
Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Background: Several (online) adaptive radiotherapy procedures are available to maximize healthy tissue sparing in the presence of inter/intrafractional motion during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on an MR-linac. The increased treatment complexity and the motion-delivery interplay during these treatments require MR-compatible motion phantoms with time-resolved dosimeters to validate end-to-end workflows. This is not possible with currently available phantoms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!