Rules of nomenclature versus principles of revision: An impudent debate.

Clin Anat

Department of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Published: March 2021

The rules of the anatomical nomenclature are sometimes in conflict with the principles of revision of the nomenclature. This is possibly most obvious is the debate about the use of the Latin words pudendus ("shameful") and sacer ("holy") in the anatomical nomenclature. The principles of revision stress preservation of traditional terms even if there are etymological concerns. On the other hand, the nomenclature rules state that anatomical names should, preferably, have informative or descriptive value and that the official Latin terms are the basis for translations of the international standard terminology into modern, vernacular languages. This issue of Clinical Anatomy contains responses to the removal of the noun pudendum and the replacement of the adjective pudendus with pudendalis in the second edition of Terminologia Anatomica.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.23705DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

principles revision
12
anatomical nomenclature
8
rules nomenclature
4
nomenclature versus
4
versus principles
4
revision impudent
4
impudent debate
4
debate rules
4
rules anatomical
4
nomenclature
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!