Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background Accurate clinical staging is crucial to managing gastrointestinal cancer, but fluorine 18 (F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT has limitations. Targeting fibroblast-activation protein is a newer diagnostic approach for the visualization of tumor stroma, and gallium 68 (Ga)-labeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs), hereafter Ga-FAPIs, present a promising alternative to F-FDG. Purpose To compare the diagnostic efficacy of Ga-FAPI PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of gastrointestinal malignancies with that of F-FDG PET/CT. Materials and Methods Images from patients with gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers who underwent contemporaneous F-FDG and Ga-FAPI PET/CT between October 2019 through June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. F-FDG and Ga-FAPI uptakes were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The McNemar test was used to compare the diagnostic performance between the two techniques. Results Thirty-five patients (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 53-68 years]; 18 men) were evaluated. In treatment-naive patients ( = 19), Ga-FAPI PET/CT led to upstaging of the clinical TNM stage in four (21%) patients compared with F-FDG PET/CT. Tracer uptake was higher with Ga-FAPI PET/CT than with F-FDG PET/CT in primary lesions (gastric cancer: 12.7 vs 3.7, respectively, = .003; colorectal cancer: 15.9 vs 7.9, = .03), involved lymph nodes (6.7 vs 2.4, < .001), and bone and visceral metastases (liver metastases: 9.7 vs 5.2, < .001; peritoneal metastases: 8.4 vs 3.6, < .001; bone metastases: 4.3 vs 2.2, < .001; lung metastases: 4.4 vs 1.9, = .01). In addition, the sensitivity of Ga-FAPI PET/CT was higher than that of F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of primary tumors (100% [19 of 19] vs 53% [10 of 19], respectively; = .004), lymph nodes (79% [22 of 28] vs 54% [15 of 28], < .001), and bone and visceral metastases (89% [31 of 35] vs 57% [20 of 35], < .001). Conclusion Gallium 68 fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor PET/CT was superior to fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers, with higher tracer uptake in most primary and metastatic lesions. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020203275 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!