The manual muscle test (MMT) is a flexible diagnostic tool, which is used in many disciplines, applied in several ways. The main problem is the subjectivity of the test. The MMT in the version of a "break test" depends on the tester's force rise and the patient's ability to resist the applied force. As a first step, the investigation of the reproducibility of the testers' force profile is required for valid application. The study examined the force profiles of = 29 testers ( = 9 experiences (Exp), = 8 little experienced (LitExp), = 12 beginners (Beg)). The testers performed 10 MMTs according to the test of hip flexors, but against a fixed leg to exclude the patient's reaction. A handheld device recorded the temporal course of the applied force. The results show significant differences between Exp and Beg concerning the starting force (p = 0.029), the ratio of starting to maximum force (p = 0.005) and the normalized mean Euclidean distances between the 10 trials (p = 0.015). The slope is significantly higher in Exp vs. LitExp ( = 0.006) and Beg ( = 0.005). The results also indicate that experienced testers show inter-tester differences and partly even a low intra-tester reproducibility. This highlights the necessity of an objective MMT-assessment. Furthermore, an agreement on a standardized force profile is required. A suggestion for this is given.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759939 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10120996 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!