AI Article Synopsis

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted medical care, specifically leading to delays in acute stroke treatment at comprehensive stroke centers in the U.S.!* -
  • A study evaluating stroke patients admitted during the pandemic showed lower odds of receiving timely thrombolysis treatment within the Target: Stroke goal of 60 minutes compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, with a median delay of 4 minutes noted.!* -
  • The findings indicated that delays were primarily due to slower imaging to treatment times, although there were no significant delays in thrombectomy procedures during the same period.!*

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: The pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to an unprecedented paradigm shift in medical care. We sought to evaluate whether the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to delays in acute stroke management at comprehensive stroke centers.

Methods: Pooled clinical data of consecutive adult stroke patients from 14 US comprehensive stroke centers (January 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020) were queried. The rate of thrombolysis for nontransferred patients within the Target: Stroke goal of 60 minutes was compared between patients admitted from March 1, 2019, and July 31, 2019 (pre-COVID-19), and March 1, 2020, to July 31, 2020 (COVID-19). The time from arrival to imaging and treatment with thrombolysis or thrombectomy, as continuous variables, were also assessed.

Results: Of the 2955 patients who met inclusion criteria, 1491 were admitted during the pre-COVID-19 period and 1464 were admitted during COVID-19, 15% of whom underwent intravenous thrombolysis. Patients treated during COVID-19 were at lower odds of receiving thrombolysis within 60 minutes of arrival (odds ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.38-0.98]; =0.04), with a median delay in door-to-needle time of 4 minutes (=0.03). The lower odds of achieving treatment in the Target: Stroke goal persisted after adjustment for all variables associated with earlier treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.85]; <0.01). The delay in thrombolysis appeared driven by the longer delay from imaging to bolus (median, 29 [interquartile range, 18-41] versus 22 [interquartile range, 13-37] minutes; =0.02). There was no significant delay in door-to-groin puncture for patients who underwent thrombectomy (median, 83 [interquartile range, 63-133] versus 90 [interquartile range, 73-129] minutes; =0.30). Delays in thrombolysis were observed in the months of June and July.

Conclusions: Evaluation for acute ischemic stroke during the COVID-19 period was associated with a small but significant delay in intravenous thrombolysis but no significant delay in thrombectomy time metrics. Taking steps to reduce delays from imaging to bolus time has the potential to attenuate this collateral effect of the pandemic.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7934334PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032789DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

covid-19 pandemic
8
comprehensive stroke
8
2019 july
8
july 2020
8
target stroke
8
stroke goal
8
lower odds
8
odds ratio
8
stroke
7
covid-19
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!