A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Does abutment preparation affect abutment screw joint stability? An in vitro study. | LitMetric

Statement Of Problem: Whether preparation of an implant abutment decreases the stability of the abutment screw joint is unclear.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the abutment preparation in laboratory conditions on the reverse torque value (RTV) of the abutment screw.

Material And Methods: Sixty implants, implant analogs, and abutments obtained from 2 different manufacturers were used in the present study and divided into 2 groups (groups B and N) according to the manufacturer. Each group was then divided into 3 subgroups (n=10) according to the remaining wall thickness (control, 0.4 mm, 0.6 mm). All abutments were tightened to analogs with 15 Ncm, and standardized preparation was made with a custom-designed copy-milling system. All abutments were tightened to the implants with 30 Ncm, and then, the abutment screws were removed and RTVs were recorded. Subgroups were analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA (α=.05), and the independent-sample t test was used to compare groups. Relationships between categorical variables were analyzed by chi-square tests. One abutment screw from each subgroup was randomly selected and analyzed by using a scanning electron microscope.

Results: A statistically significant difference was found between RTVs of different manufacturers (group B=28.2 ±1.2 Ncm, group N=25.9 ±1.4 Ncm; P<.005). In group N, there was a significant difference among subgroups, control (26.7 ±1.4 Ncm), and 0.6-mm wall thickness (24.8 ±0.8 Ncm) (P<.05). A statistically significant relationship was found between preparation and RTV for the NucleOSS only (P<.05) and between manufacturer and RTV (P<.001). Scanning electron microscopy evaluations identified different screw head and thread designs.

Conclusions: The abutment screw joint stability of the BioHorizons implant was not affected by abutment preparation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

abutment screw
12
abutment
8
abutment preparation
8
screw joint
8
in vitro study
8
abutments tightened
8
preparation affect
4
affect abutment
4
joint stability?
4
stability? in vitro
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!