Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Statement Of Problem: Whether preparation of an implant abutment decreases the stability of the abutment screw joint is unclear.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the abutment preparation in laboratory conditions on the reverse torque value (RTV) of the abutment screw.
Material And Methods: Sixty implants, implant analogs, and abutments obtained from 2 different manufacturers were used in the present study and divided into 2 groups (groups B and N) according to the manufacturer. Each group was then divided into 3 subgroups (n=10) according to the remaining wall thickness (control, 0.4 mm, 0.6 mm). All abutments were tightened to analogs with 15 Ncm, and standardized preparation was made with a custom-designed copy-milling system. All abutments were tightened to the implants with 30 Ncm, and then, the abutment screws were removed and RTVs were recorded. Subgroups were analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA (α=.05), and the independent-sample t test was used to compare groups. Relationships between categorical variables were analyzed by chi-square tests. One abutment screw from each subgroup was randomly selected and analyzed by using a scanning electron microscope.
Results: A statistically significant difference was found between RTVs of different manufacturers (group B=28.2 ±1.2 Ncm, group N=25.9 ±1.4 Ncm; P<.005). In group N, there was a significant difference among subgroups, control (26.7 ±1.4 Ncm), and 0.6-mm wall thickness (24.8 ±0.8 Ncm) (P<.05). A statistically significant relationship was found between preparation and RTV for the NucleOSS only (P<.05) and between manufacturer and RTV (P<.001). Scanning electron microscopy evaluations identified different screw head and thread designs.
Conclusions: The abutment screw joint stability of the BioHorizons implant was not affected by abutment preparation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.028 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!