AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the impact of the labrum on hip impingement and range of motion (ROM), specifically comparing cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH).
  • Using MRI and CT scans, the researchers measured the labrum's size and recreated a virtual labrum to simulate dynamic conditions, assessing maximum hip flexion and internal rotation angles before and after labral reconstruction.
  • Results showed that the labrum was thicker and wider in BDDH compared to FAI, with more significant decreases in internal rotation angles post-reconstruction in BDDH, indicating that the labrum plays a crucial role in hip mechanics and potential impingement

Article Abstract

Background: The labrum is likely to influence impingement, which may also depend on acetabular coverage. Simulating impingement using 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) is a potential solution to evaluating range of motion (ROM); however, it is based on bony structures rather than on soft tissue.

Purpose: To examine ROM when the labrum is considered in a 3D dynamic simulation. A particular focus was evaluation of maximum flexion and internal rotation angles before occurrence of impingement, comparing them in cases of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH).

Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT scans of 40 hips (20 with cam-type FAI and 20 with BDDH) were reviewed retrospectively. The thickness and width of the labrum were measured on MRI scans. A virtual labrum was reconstructed based on patient-specific sizes measured on MRI scans. The impingement point was identified using 3D dynamic simulation and was compared with the internal rotation angle before and after labral reconstruction.

Results: The thickness and width of the labrum were significantly larger in BDDH than in FAI ( < .001). In FAI, the maximum internal rotation angles without the labrum were 30.3° at 90° of flexion and 56.9° at 45° of flexion, with these values decreasing to 18.7° and 41.4°, respectively, after labral reconstruction ( < .001). In BDDH, the maximum internal rotation angles were 48.0° at 90° of flexion and 76.7° at 45° of flexion without the labrum, decreasing to 31.1° and 55.3°, respectively, after labral reconstruction ( < .001). The differences in the angles before and after labral reconstruction were larger in BDDH than in FAI (90° of flexion, = .03; 45° of flexion, = .01).

Conclusion: As the labrum was significantly more hypertrophic in BDDH than in FAI, the virtual labral model revealed that the labrum's interference with the maximum internal rotation angle was also significantly larger in BDDH.

Clinical Relevance: The labrum has a significant effect on impingement; this is more significant for BDDH than for FAI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675874PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120964465DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

internal rotation
20
bddh fai
16
rotation angles
12
mri scans
12
maximum internal
12
90° flexion
12
45° flexion
12
labral reconstruction
12
labrum
9
range motion
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!