AI Article Synopsis

  • A new treatment approach for endoscopically unresectable colon polyps aims to reduce unnecessary surgeries by using colon conservation techniques (CCT), starting with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
  • Of the 102 polyps treated, 75.5% were successfully managed without needing segmental colectomy, and the algorithm effectively avoided surgery for 74.2% of patients.
  • Compared to segmental colectomy, the CCT algorithm showed longer operation times but resulted in shorter hospital stays and lower overall healthcare costs, particularly for ESD and combined endo-laparoscopic surgeries.

Article Abstract

Background: The majority of endoscopically unresectable colon polyps (EUCP) are treated by segmental colectomy. However, up to 90% of EUCP do not harbor malignancy, making colectomy an unnecessary procedure. To minimize unnecessary segmental colectomy, we established a progressive treatment algorithm utilizing colon conservation techniques (CCT). In our progressive CCT algorithm, patients with EUCP first underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). If unsuccessful, they progressed to combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) and ultimately to segmental colectomy, if necessary.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated by our progressive CCT algorithm from August 2015 to April 2019. Demographic information, polyp characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. We also compared the outcomes of our CCT algorithm group to 156 patients undergoing segmental colectomy for EUCP at related institutions from August 2015 to August 2018.

Results: A total of 102 EUCP in 97 patients were treated with our progressive CCT algorithm. Of these, 76 of 102 (75.5%) EUCP were removed without requiring segmental colectomy, with 42 EUCP removed via ESD and 34 via CELS. Interval surveillance colonoscopy confirmed that 72 of 97 (74.2%) patients with EUCP treated by CCT completely avoided segmental colectomy. Polyps > 5 cm in size was a significant predictor of CCT failure (OR 3.83, P = 0.03). When compared to an external cohort of patients undergoing segmental colectomy for EUCP, the CCT algorithm was associated with longer operative time, but shorter length of stay, with no difference in postoperative complications. The estimated total healthcare cost of the CCT algorithm was lower than segmental colectomy ($10,956.77 versus $16,692.94), with more dramatic cost savings seen in ESD ($4,492.70) and CELS ($8,507.06).

Conclusions: An established progressive CCT algorithm can result in high colon conservation rate and decrease associated health care costs compared to segmental colectomy. It is a reasonable treatment strategy for patients with EUCP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08163-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

segmental colectomy
36
cct algorithm
28
progressive cct
16
colon conservation
12
patients eucp
12
colectomy eucp
12
eucp
10
colectomy
10
cct
10
segmental
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!