Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Dried blood samples have been increasingly considered for clinical applications in recent years. The main disadvantages that limit DBS utility in clinical applications are the small sample volume collected, area bias and homogeneity issues, and sample preparation requirements for the necessary sensitivity and reproducibility required for clinical assessment. The recent advances in antibody array technology overcome the common disadvantages of immunoassay approaches by increasing the multiplex capabilities and decreasing the sample volume requirements as well as minimizing the expense and technical expertise required with many alternative high-density approaches like mass spectrometry.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1064-0_16 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!