A Novel Absorbable Stapler Provides Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness Noninferior to Subcuticular Skin Closure: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Plast Reconstr Surg

From the Departments of Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgery, Burn Plastic Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Plastic Surgery, and Research and Innovation and the Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Nantes University Hospital; the Clinical Research Department, District Hospital Center; EA 4275 Biostatistics, Pharmacoepidemiology and Human Sciences Research Unit, and SPHERE, UMR INSERM U1246, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes; and the French School of Public Health.

Published: December 2020

Background: Deep dermal suturing is critical for scar quality outcomes. The authors evaluated a new, fast medical device for dermal suturing, with the hypothesis of noninferiority with regard to clinical scar and cost-effectiveness.

Methods: A prospective, patient-blind, randomized, multicenter noninferiority study in 26 French hospitals was conducted. Patients were randomized 1:1 to suturing with conventional thread or a semiautomatic stapler. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale was rated at 3 months for primary endpoint effectiveness. Secondary endpoints were cost-effectiveness of the two suturing methods, prevalence of complications, suturing/operating time, Observer Scar Assessment Scale and Patient Scar Assessment Scale score, scar aesthetic quality 18 months after surgery, and occupational exposure to blood during surgery.

Results: Six hundred sixty-four patients were enrolled, 660 were randomized, and 649 constituted the full analysis (stapler arm, n = 324; needle arm, n = 325). Primary endpoint Patient Scar Assessment Scale score in the stapler arm was not inferior to that in the needle arm at 3 months or after 18 months. The mean operating time was 180 minutes in the stapler arm and 179 minutes in the needle arm (p = not significant). The mean suturing time was significantly lower in the stapler arm (p < 0.001). There were seven occupational exposures to blood in the needle arm and one in the stapler arm. The two arms did not differ significantly in terms of complications (p = 0.41). The additional cost of using the device was &OV0556;51.57 for the complete-case population.

Conclusion: Wound healing outcome was no worse than with conventional suturing using a semiautomatic stapler and associated with less occupational exposure to blood.

Clinical Question/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic, I.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007356DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stapler arm
20
scar assessment
16
assessment scale
16
needle arm
16
patient scar
12
arm
9
stapler
8
dermal suturing
8
semiautomatic stapler
8
primary endpoint
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!