Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the local anesthesia efficacy of ropivacaine 0.75% compared to lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine for postoperative analgesia following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

Study Design: In this randomized, double-blind crossover clinical trial, 30 participants underwent surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars under local anesthesia using ropivacaine 0.75% or lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The pain was recorded on a visual analog scale at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. The use of analgesics and the presence of adverse effects were recorded.

Results: The duration of soft tissue anesthesia in the ropivacaine group was significantly longer than that in the lidocaine group. The lidocaine group recorded significantly higher visual analog scale scores at all postoperative time intervals, except in the final 48-h period. Analgesic use was higher in the lidocaine group. Rescue medication was used by 2 patients in each group (6.7%). Significantly more postoperative bleeding was seen in the ropivacaine group.

Conclusion: Ropivacaine 0.75% injection before the surgical procedure may be associated with preventive analgesia for extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2020.09.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

impacted mandibular
16
mandibular third
16
local anesthesia
12
anesthesia ropivacaine
12
analgesia extraction
12
extraction impacted
12
ropivacaine 075%
12
lidocaine group
12
postoperative analgesia
8
clinical trial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!