Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This paper reported when sulfamethazine (SMT) and antimony (Sb(V)) coexisted in aqueous solution at pH of 3.0, 5.0 and 7.0, the complexation between SMT and Sb(V) occurred. Such a complexation impeded the adsorption of Sb(V) on the black soil. The higher the solution pH value was, the more the amount of Sb(V) was prevented from adsorbing on the black soil. The maximum adsorption capacity (q) of Sb(V) at the presence of SMT under pH of 3.0, 5.0 and 7.0 was 5.28, 3.45 and 1.95 mg/g, respectively. -NH, NH, SO and CN of pyrimidine ring carried by SMT acted as the complexation sites with Sb(V). The complexation constant K were - 3.15, -3.26 and - 3.48 at pH of 7.0, 5.0 and 3.0, respectively, indicating that the complexation strength between SMT and Sb(V) followed the order of pH 7.0 > pH 5.0 > pH 3.0. The binding energy between Sb(V) and the CN group of pyrimidine ring was the highest (1.42 eV), and then followed by the groups of -NH (1.37 eV), SO (0.66 eV) and -NH (0.39 eV). Besides SO and CN, Sb(V) tends to complex with NH via coordination bond at pH of 7.0 while -NH via cation-π interaction at pH 3.0 and 5.0. Compared to pH of 5.0, the strength of cation-π interaction at pH of 3.0 weakened according to the molecular electrostatic potential map. These results demonstrated that different from the situation where Sb(V) exists in aqueous solution alone, the coexistence of SMT with Sb(V) affected the adsorption behavior of Sb(V) in soil and solution pH was also an influence factor. These findings in this paper would be helpful for further understanding the mobility, bioavailability and other environmental behavior of Sb(V) in soil when Sb(V) coexists with antibiotics even other organic compounds.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143318 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!