This paper presents methods to calculate the length overestimation errors which are being made when approximating a discrete line by edges of triangular tessellation and marching squares algorithm. The maximum error and its average value are 15.47 % and 10.27 % for the triangular tessellation, while for the marching squares approach they are 8.24 % and 5.49 %, respectively. Mathematical calculations were compared with experimental results obtained by the Electron Backscatter Diffraction technique showing their usefulness as correction coefficients to obtain more accurate boundary length estimates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2020.102966DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

triangular tessellation
12
tessellation marching
12
marching squares
12
squares algorithm
8
estimation systematic
4
systematic errors
4
errors discrete
4
discrete approximation
4
approximation triangular
4
algorithm paper
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!