Monitoring photographic proof of cecal intubation: A closed-loop audit of best practice colonoscopy.

Indian J Gastroenterol

General Surgery Department, Epsom and St Helier NHS trust, Wrythe Ln, Sutton, Carshalton, SM5 1AA, UK.

Published: February 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • - In the UK, a gold standard for colonoscopy requires a 90% cecal intubation (CI) rate, with endoscopists obligated to provide photographic evidence confirming successful CI, such as images of the ileum or ileocecal valve.
  • - An audit of 396 colonoscopies showed that initially only 70% met CI proof requirements, with only half of those providing clearly marked proof of intubation in photographs.
  • - After a repeat audit, 71% of colonoscopies improved to meet best practice standards, highlighting the need for regular audits and the importance of photographic evidence to prevent clinical and legal issues.

Article Abstract

Gold standard colonoscopy in the UK demands a 90% cecal intubation (CI) rate. Endoscopists must provide photographic evidence of CI, which can include images of the terminal ileum, appendix orifice, anastomosis or ileocecal valve. Whilst photographic proof of intubation should be obtained for all complete colonoscopies, this is not routinely audited. Three hundred and ninety-six complete colonoscopies were analyzed, 200 in an initial audit, and 196 in a second audit. Photos taken during colonoscopy were reviewed for evidence of successful CI, as well as whether these photographs had been marked as "proof of intubation" (POI). Results were shared at departmental governance meetings in order to assess any improvement in practice. Initial audit revealed 70% of colonoscopies had provided sufficient proof of CI but only 50% provided photographs that were described as such. Twenty percent of colonoscopies provided sufficient images, but these were not identified as POI. Thirty percent of all colonoscopies provided insufficient proof of CI. Upon repeat audit, 71% of colonoscopies met best practice standards, with the remaining 29% showing insufficient evidence of CI. In the modern era of digital technology, lack of photographic evidence should be seen as unacceptable and may raise important clinical and medicolegal concerns. We recommend that audits such as this become standard practice to ensure best practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-020-01085-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

best practice
12
colonoscopies provided
12
photographic proof
8
cecal intubation
8
photographic evidence
8
complete colonoscopies
8
initial audit
8
provided sufficient
8
percent colonoscopies
8
colonoscopies
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!