AI Article Synopsis
- The study looked at how many people decided to wait on their scheduled orthopedic surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic and if this changed over time.
- Researchers called patients on waiting lists to ask if they wanted to go through with their surgery or delay it, and those who chose to delay were asked why.
- Over the months, fewer patients wanted to postpone their surgeries, dropping from 76% in April to just 5% in September, mainly because they felt safer about getting surgery with lower COVID-19 risks.
Article Abstract
Aims: The primary aim was to assess the rate of patient deferral of elective orthopaedic surgery and whether this changed with time during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The secondary aim was to explore the reasons why patients wanted to defer surgery and what measures/circumstances would enable them to go forward with surgery.
Methods: Patients were randomly selected from elective orthopaedic waiting lists at three centres in the UK in April, June, August, and September 2020 and were contacted by telephone. Patients were asked whether they wanted to proceed or defer surgery. Patients who wished to defer were asked seven questions relating to potential barriers to proceeding with surgery and were asked whether there were measures/circumstances that would allow them to go forward with surgery.
Results: There was a significant decline in the rate of deferral for surgery from April (n = 38/50, 76%), June (n = 68/233, 29%), to August (n = 6/50, 12%) and September (n = 5/100, 5%) (p < 0.001). Patients wishing to defer were older (68 years (SD 10.1) vs 65 (SD 11.9)), more likely to be female (65% (44/68) vs 53% (88/165)) and waiting for a knee arthroplasty (65% (44/68) vs 41% (67/165); p < 0.001). By September 2020, all patients that deferred in June at one centre had proceeded or wanted to proceed with surgery due to a perceived lower risk of acquiring COVID-19 perioperatively (68%, n = 15) or because their symptoms had progressed (32%, n = 7). The most common reason (n = 14/17, 82%) for patients deferring surgery in September was the perceived risk of acquiring COVID-19 while as an inpatient. When asked what measures or circumstances would enable them to proceed with surgery, the most common (n = 7, 41%) response was reassurance of a COVID-19 free hospital.
Conclusion: The rate of deferral fell to 5% by September, which was due to a lower perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 perioperatively or worsening of symptoms while waiting. The potential of a COVID-19-free hospital and communication of mortality risk may improve a patient's willingness to go forward with surgery.Cite this article: 2020;1-10:663-668.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659700 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.110.BJO-2020-0135.R1 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Clinical cut-offs for hip- and knee arthroplasty outcome - minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM).
Qual Life Res
January 2025
The Norwegian Fracture Register, Helse Vest RHF, Stavanger, Norway.
Purpose: Clinical cut-offs like minimum clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) increase the interpretability of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), but cut-off estimates vary considerably, clouding a clear definition of a successful surgical outcome. We report estimates of MCII and PASS following hip- and knee arthroplasty using multiple methods and compare the different estimation methods.
Methods: Elective hip or knee arthroplasty patients who underwent the regular pre- and postoperative assessments 2014-2018 were included.
Characterization and Targeting of the Main Drivers of Elective Imaging Utilization: A Cross-sectional Study Applying Conjoint Analysis.
J Am Coll Radiol
January 2025
University of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, IL.
Objective: To characterize patient and referring physician preferences when selecting where to have elective imaging performed METHODS: In this Institutional Research Board approved survey-based study, online surveys were completed by 393 patients who had recently had a non-contrast MRI of the shoulder, lumbar spine, or knee within the past 2 years and 168 physicians who had ordered at least 12 such MRIs in the past year. The survey data included explicit questions about preferences as well as a set of conjoint choice screens. Conjoint analysis utilized a logistic model estimated using maximum likelihood estimation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurvivorship and Outcomes of Hip Arthroplasty for Elective Care Versus Fracture in Patients Who Have Solid Organ Transplant: Lung Transplant Patients Do Worse.
J Arthroplasty
January 2025
Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX. Electronic address:
Background: With continued improvement in patient outcomes following solid organ transplant (SOT), more SOT recipients may benefit from hip arthroplasty. This study sought to compare the perioperative complications and survivorship of SOT recipients undergoing hip arthroplasty for elective care versus for fracture.
Methods: A single-institution retrospective review yielded 95 hip arthroplasty procedures (80 patients) performed between August 2016 and May 2023 with a mean follow-up of 35 months.
Does morbid obesity negatively impact perioperative outcomes following elective reverse shoulder arthroplasty?: a propensity-matched comparative study.
JSES Int
November 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Background: The incidence of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and the prevalence of obesity have increased in the United States. Despite this, the literature assessing the effect of morbid obesity (body mass index≥40 kg/m) on perioperative surgical outcomes remains inconsistent.
Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive elective primary rTSA cases from January 2016 through September 2023 at a single tertiary referral center was performed.
A Study of Orthopedic Patient Leaflets and Readability of AI-Generated Text in Foot and Ankle Surgery (SOLE-AI).
Cureus
December 2024
Trauma and Orthopedics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, GBR.
Introduction The internet age has broadened the horizons of modern medicine, and the ever-increasing scope of artificial intelligence (AI) has made information about healthcare, common pathologies, and available treatment options much more accessible to the wider population. Patient autonomy relies on clear, accurate, and user-friendly information to give informed consent to an intervention. Our paper aims to outline the quality, readability, and accuracy of readily available information produced by AI relating to common foot and ankle procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!