Purpose: To compare small incision lenticule extraction with prophylactic cross-linking (SMILE Xtra) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with prophylactic cross-linking (FS-LASIK Xtra) in their safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study. Forty-eight eyes subjected to SMILE Xtra and 90 eyes subjected to FS-LASIK Xtra were enrolled. The enrolled eyes exhibited either borderline corneal topography or high myopia with thin cornea. The following parameters were evaluated before surgery and at 1 day; 1 week; and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery: corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected distance visual acuity, manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), keratometry values, and thinnest corneal thickness.

Results: After 1 month, no eye showed loss of 1 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. At 12 months, uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better for 98% and 99% eyes in the SMILE Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra groups, respectively (P = 0.657). For 93.8% eyes in the SMILE Xtra group and 90% eyes in the FS-LASIK Xtra group, the achieved MRSE was within ±0.50 diopter of the intended MRSE (P = 0.669). The correlation coefficients for predictability of MRSE correction by SMILE Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra were 0.987 and 0.983, respectively. The mean MRSE values, keratometry values, and thinnest corneal thickness measured at the different time points showed no significant intra- or intergroup differences.

Conclusions: Our evaluations of 1-year outcomes suggest that the safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of SMILE Xtra are comparable with those of FS-LASIK Xtra.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002547DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

smile xtra
24
fs-lasik xtra
24
prophylactic cross-linking
16
distance visual
16
visual acuity
16
xtra
12
1-year outcomes
8
small incision
8
incision lenticule
8
lenticule extraction
8

Similar Publications

[Clinical outcomes of SMILE Xtra for myopia correction].

Vestn Oftalmol

November 2024

OOO Oftalmologicheskaya klinika Spektr, Moscow, Russia.

Article Synopsis
  • This study evaluated the outcomes of the SMILE Xtra technique for patients with thin corneas at risk for keratectasia, involving 53 patients with myopia.
  • It found significant improvements in uncorrected visual acuity and stable refractive results over 12 months, with no cases of keratectasia or major complications reported.
  • The initial decrease in central corneal thickness and mild post-operative symptoms resolved within a week, indicating that SMILE Xtra is a viable option for those with thin corneas.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the changes of the corneal epithelial thickness (ET) profile induced by combined small incision lenticule extraction and accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (SMILE-xtra) for myopia compared with the standard small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Setting: Nuri Eye Hospital, 61, Dunsan-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 35233, Korea.

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcome during 24 months follow-up between small incision lenticule extraction combined with cross-linking (SMILE Xtra) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) only. . Ophthalmology Division of San Rossore Medical Center, Pisa, Italy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To study the corneal morphology and biomechanics in cases of small incision lenticule extraction with prophylactic accelerated collagen cross-linking (SMILE Xtra).

Methods: This study was a retrospective study. 28 eyes of 14 patients with moderate-high risk of postoperative ectasia according to the Randleman scoring system underwent SMILE Xtra procedure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare the long-term safety, efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability following SMILE versus SMILE combined with accelerated cross-linking (SMILE XTRA), and to specifically study the regression patterns following the two procedures.

Methods: This retrospective study included 54 eyes of SMILE and 54 eyes of SMILE XTRA treated for normal and borderline cases of myopia/myopic astigmatism, respectively, based on certain predefined topographic features and risk factors. Patients in both the groups were matched for age and refractive error.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!