Objectives: Forrest classification for ulceration has significant intra and inter-observer variability. The endoscopic doppler probe (DOP-US) identifies arterial blood flow at the base to direct therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of the DOP-US in bleeding peptic ulcers.

Methods: Three independent reviewers performed a comprehensive review of all original articles published from inception to December 2019, evaluating the use of DOP-US in peptic ulcer bleeding. Primary outcomes were the comparison of rebleeding rate, mortality, and surgical intervention in patients with DOP-US signal-guided therapy versus standard visual evaluation guided therapy.

Results: Eight studies were included after a thorough search was concluded using the key words. The use of DOP-US probe decreases rebleeding, mortality, and surgical intervention as compared to Forrest Classification. The risk of rebleeding is significantly higher if the signal persists despite endoscopic therapy (48.5% (95% CI 29.5-67.9%)).

Conclusion: The first systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the DOP-US is a beneficial tool in the management of bleeding ulcers and adds valuable information to visual evaluation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2021.1850261DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic review
12
review meta-analysis
12
endoscopic doppler
8
doppler probe
8
management bleeding
8
bleeding peptic
8
forrest classification
8
mortality surgical
8
surgical intervention
8
visual evaluation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!