Array
(
    [id] => chatcmpl-AipYoSh06PF2z36gMzyYY3eo9IdZu
    [object] => chat.completion
    [created] => 1735247994
    [model] => gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18
    [choices] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [index] => 0
                    [message] => Array
                        (
                            [role] => assistant
                            [content] => * The study investigates the safety and effectiveness of using the subclavian artery (TSc) as an alternative access route for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), comparing it with the traditional femoral artery (TF) approach. *!  
* A systematic review of nine observational studies with a total of 2,938 patients showed that outcomes for both access routes were largely comparable in terms of serious complications, such as 30-day mortality and stroke, but procedural times were longer for the subclavian approach. *!  
* The findings suggest that subclavian access for TAVI is a safe and feasible option, especially for patients for whom the femoral approach is not suitable, with notably lower risks of major vascular complications.
                            [refusal] => 
                        )

                    [logprobs] => 
                    [finish_reason] => length
                )

        )

    [usage] => Array
        (
            [prompt_tokens] => 570
            [completion_tokens] => 150
            [total_tokens] => 720
            [prompt_tokens_details] => Array
                (
                    [cached_tokens] => 0
                    [audio_tokens] => 0
                )

            [completion_tokens_details] => Array
                (
                    [reasoning_tokens] => 0
                    [audio_tokens] => 0
                    [accepted_prediction_tokens] => 0
                    [rejected_prediction_tokens] => 0
                )

        )

    [system_fingerprint] => fp_d02d531b47
)