Much has been written about the placebo effects in functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGD), especially in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), driven by the early hypothesis that in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IBS, the placebo effect might be specifically high and thus, corrupts the efficacy of novel drugs developed for this condition. This narrative review is based on a specific search method, a database (www.jips.online) developed since 2004 containing more than 4,500 papers (data papers, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, reviews) pertinent to the topic placebo effects/placebo response. Three central questions-deducted from the body of current literature-are addressed to explore the evidence behind this hypothesis: What is the size placebo effect in FGD, especially in IBS, and is it different from the placebo effect seen in other gastrointestinal disorders? Is the placebo effect in FGD different from other functional, non-intestinal disorders, in other pain syndromes? Is the placebo effect in FGD related to placebo effects seen in psychiatry, in depression, anxiety disorders, and alike? Following this discussion, a fourth question is raised as the result of the three: What are the consequences of this for future drug trials in FGD? In summary it is concluded that, contrary to common belief and discussion, the placebo effect seen in RCT in FGD is not specifically high and extraordinary as compared to other comparable ( functional) disorders. It shares less than expected commonalities with the placebo effect in psychiatry, and very few predictors have yet been identified that determine its effect size, especially some that are driven by design features of the studies. Current practice of RCT in IBS seems to limit and control the placebo effect quite well, and future trial practice, head-to-head trial, still offers options to maintain this control, even in the absence of placebos used.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7477083 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00797 | DOI Listing |
Diabetes Ther
January 2025
The State Key Laboratory Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, People's Republic of China.
Introduction: Scientific publications have shown sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to have several beneficial effects in patients with complex type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, sodium-glucose co-transporter-1 (SGLT-1) inhibitor is still under investigation in clinical trials. Recently, a dual inhibitor of sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT1/2), sotagliflozin, has been approved for use in patients with T2DM.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFuture Oncol
January 2025
uHuntsman Cancer Institute (NCI-CCC), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
J Med Econ
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
AimsThe cardioprotective effects of semaglutide 2.4 mg reported in the SELECT cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574597) provide clinical benefit for subjects with overweight or obesity and established CV disease without type 2 diabetes (T2D).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeuropsychiatr Dis Treat
January 2025
Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
Peripartum depression (PPD) affects approximately one in every eight birthing individuals. Despite a high prevalence, PPD is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Several PPD treatment options exist including psychotherapies, conventional serotonergic-based antidepressants and alternative and integrative medicine approaches.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Orthop Trauma
March 2025
Department of Pharmacy Practice, NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Background: The effectiveness of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (IA-PRP) injections for managing pain in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) remains inconsistent. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of IA-PRP.
Methods: A total of 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected from various scientific databases, all of which compared PRP to either a placebo or an active comparator, such as corticosteroids (CS), in the treatment of KOA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!