AI Article Synopsis

  • The postrhinal cortex (POR) integrates egocentric and allocentric spatial information, while the perirhinal cortex (PRC) focuses on object encoding for spatial learning.
  • Both areas send signals to the hippocampus, which creates complex associative memories, with differentiated responses depending on the scale of the items (macroscale vs. microscale).
  • Research using fluorescence hybridization revealed that macroscale item-place learning increased the expression of the immediate early gene Arc in specific areas of the POR and PRC, but microscale learning did not, suggesting that larger items are processed differently by these brain regions.

Article Abstract

Whereas the postrhinal cortex (POR) is a critical center for the integration of egocentric and allocentric spatial information, the perirhinal cortex (PRC) plays an important role in the encoding of objects that supports spatial learning. The POR and PRC send afferents to the hippocampus, a structure that builds complex associative memories from the spatial experience. Hippocampal encoding of item-place experience is accompanied by the nuclear expression of immediate early gene (IEGs). Subfields of the Cornus ammonius and subregions of the hippocampus exhibit differentiated and distinct encoding responses, depending on whether the spatial location and relationships of large highly visible items (macroscale encoding) or small partially concealed items (microscale encoding), is learned. But to what extent the PRC and POR support hippocampal processing of different kinds of item-place representations is unclear. Using fluorescence hybridization (FISH), we examined the effect of macroscale (overt, landmark) and microscale (subtle, discrete) item-place learning on the nuclear expression of the IEG, Arc. We observed an increase in Arc mRNA in the caudal part of PRC area 35 and the caudal part of the POR after macroscale, but not microscale item-place learning. The caudal part of PRC area 36, the rostral and middle parts of PRC areas 35 and 36, as well as the middle part of the POR responded to neither type of item. These results suggest that macroscale items may contain a strong identity component that is processed by specific compartments of the PRC and POR. In contrast small, microscale items are not encoded by the POR or PRC, indicating that item dimensions may play a role in the involvement of these structures in item processing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7584114PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.556645DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prc
8
por prc
8
nuclear expression
8
prc por
8
item-place learning
8
caudal prc
8
prc area
8
por
7
encoding
6
microscale
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!